16.1 C
London
Wednesday, July 22, 2026
Home Blog

UN officials warn regional escalation threatens Syria’s ‘pivotal’ recovery

0
un-officials-warn-regional-escalation-threatens-syria’s-‘pivotal’-recovery
UN officials warn regional escalation threatens Syria’s ‘pivotal’ recovery

United Nations officials told the Security Council on Tuesday that Syria has reached a critical turning point toward national recovery, but continued regional instability and funding shortfalls risk reversing gains, Anadolu reports.

“Syria stands at a pivotal moment,” said Edem Wosornu, director of the Crisis Response Division at the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, or OCHA. She reported that since the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024, approximately 1.7 million refugees and 1.9 million internally displaced persons have returned to their communities. Wosornu warned, however, that the returns will not be sustainable without addressing massive deficits in housing, infrastructure and access to basic services.

– Israeli incursions, regional risks

Wosornu identified Israeli military activity in southern Syria as a primary threat to national stability. She noted that repeated incursions and movement restrictions are complicating humanitarian operations in areas where 80% of the population requires assistance. “Any escalation in the wider region could quickly trigger new humanitarian needs, including displacement, economic disruption, [and] supply chain shocks,” she cautioned.

Deputy Special Envoy Claudio Cordone echoed those concerns, condemning “illegal Israeli military incursions” in Quneitra and Daraa. He cited instances where Israeli forces killed individuals east of the ceasefire line and harassed UN staff. Cordone warned that statements from Israeli officials indicating an intent to hold territory violate Syrian sovereignty and the 1974 Disengagement Agreement, further heightening regional tensions.

Areas of southern Syria have witnessed repeated Israeli incursions and attacks in recent months, including raids, searches and arrests, as well as the establishment of military checkpoints.

Following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime on Dec. 8, 2024, Israel declared the 1974 disengagement agreement with Syria void and moved into a UN-monitored buffer zone. Syria’s new administration has repeatedly affirmed its commitment to the agreement.

​​​​​​​Despite the absence of direct threats from Syria’s new leadership, Israel has continued airstrikes and ground operations in Syria, causing civilian casualties and damage to military infrastructure.

– Institutional progress, economic hurdles

Despite the security challenges, Cordone highlighted significant political milestones under President Ahmad al-Sharaa, including the appointment of a Supreme Constitutional Court and the inauguration of a diverse People’s Assembly, which features professionals, tribal representatives, and survivors of the conflict. He noted that the assembly is preparing for a permanent Constitution and future inclusive elections.

The deputy envoy also welcomed US President Donald Trump’s recent decision to remove Syria from the state sponsor of terrorism list as a “significant step forward” for international re-engagement. He noted that new economic ties are forming with France, Iraq and Lebanon to rehabilitate vital infrastructure like the Kirkuk-Baniyas oil pipeline.

Wosornu emphasized a deepening financial crisis, however, revealing that the humanitarian appeal remains only one-third funded. The shortfall has forced the World Food Program to halve its emergency assistance, reducing its reach from 1.3 million to 650,000 people. She argued that humanitarian aid and long-term recovery must be pursued simultaneously to prevent leaving the most vulnerable behind.

– Syria returns to UN Security Council as ‘story of success’

Syria has undergone a historic transformation from a war-torn battlefield into a diplomatic and economic bridge, the nation’s permanent representative told the Security Council.

“Syria has appeared before this council for a long time as an intractable crisis. Today, however, it returns to the council as a story of success,” said Ibrahim Olabi. He pointed to the convening of an inclusive People’s Assembly and the formation of a Supreme Constitutional Court as evidence of a “new Syria” regaining its future.

Olabi criticized Israeli military actions, contrasting Syria’s “diplomacy and restraint” with what he characterized as the “narrow electoral calculations” of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “We are fully aware that dialogue does not mean accepting occupation, and diplomacy does not mean relinquishing our rights,” said Olabi.

The Turkish representative welcomed Syria’s progress in “inclusive governance” and noted that the US intent to rescind the terrorism designation will significantly aid reconstruction. The official also condemned Israeli raids in western Daraa as a “clear violation” of the 1974 Separation of Forces Agreement.

US Ambassador Tammy Bruce described the Syrian government as a “regional leader” in the campaign against Hezbollah and the ISIS (Daesh) terror organization. She congratulated Damascus for intercepting an alleged Iranian weapons shipment intended for Hezbollah, asserting that Syria will not allow its territory to be used for attacks on Israel.

Russian representative Anna Evstigneeva expressed support for the restoration of Syria’s territorial integrity while raising concerns about persistent Israeli raids. She advocated for the complete removal of “illegal” unilateral sanctions to facilitate economic recovery and alleviate the underfunded humanitarian crisis.

Range Rover answers the question: “What if we built a not-SUV?”

0
range-rover-answers-the-question:-“what-if-we-built-a-not-suv?”
Range Rover answers the question: “What if we built a not-SUV?”

WOLVERHAMPTON, England—One can argue about whether or not Range Rover invented the luxury SUV category, but there’s no question that since the first Range Rover went on sale in 1970, the brand has made itself the standard that other luxury SUVs have to measure against. But what if Range Rover built something that wasn’t an SUV?

That’s exactly what it’s doing with the new Range Rover GT. Spy shots have been circulating for at least a year of what was believed to be an all-electric replacement for the Range Rover Velar. It turns out that was a misapprehension; the heavily camouflaged prototypes were examples of the Range Rover GT being tested at the Nürburgring and the Arctic Circle.

Will this be Range Rover’s answer to the Lucid Air and Porsche Taycan?

Will this be Range Rover’s answer to the Lucid Air and Porsche Taycan? Credit: Range Rover

Range Rover still isn’t ready to reveal an uncamouflaged GT, but the car you see is much less disguised than the boxy-looking prototypes seen in earlier spy shots.

The Range Rover GT will be the first vehicle from Jaguar Land Rover to use the new EMA flexible platform, which has been designed, like the MLA platform that underpins the Range Rover, to be powertrain-agnostic. At launch, the Range Rover GT will be a full battery electric vehicle, but the company has plans to add a hybrid EV version to the mix as well.

“We have spent the last few years working obsessively on the fundamentals of the GT formula, reinterpreted in a sophisticated, uniquely Range Rover way,” said Martin Limpert, managing director of Range Rover. “The result is the most car-like, yet unmistakably capable, Range Rover ever created, now possible on our electrified EMA architecture—complementing our existing powertrain portfolio to deliver a complete set of options for every customer need. Its blend of effortless EV performance, first-class long-haul refinement and all-terrain capability is pure Range Rover; while its calming interior previews our vision of a modern grand tourer,” he said.

RR GT interior

The interior uses an interesting mix of textiles and materials.

RR GT interior

The back seat can be either two seats (seen here) or a three-seat bench.

EMA is the company’s third electrifiable platform, the others are the already mentioned MLA, used by Range Rovers, and the JEA platform being developed by Jaguar for its forthcoming Type 01. Like the Range Rover GT, the Jaguar is also a four-door grand tourer, which should debut later this year.

Range Rover showed Ars the GT’s interior, which is a clear departure from the cabins of its SUVs. It’s gone ultraminimalist, at least at first glance—it still satisfies safety regulators in Europe and elsewhere that require physical controls for certain functions. I was delighted to see that Range Rover’s designers eschewed the idea of a third screen for the front passenger; the main instrument display and the infotainment touchscreen are both OLED screens, and Range Rover has made the head-up display standard for the GT.

More details about the GT, including what it actually looks like underneath that camo, should be forthcoming later this year.

India’s Maruti Suzuki to hike prices for second time in two months

0
india’s-maruti-suzuki-to-hike-prices-for-second-time-in-two-months
India’s Maruti Suzuki to hike prices for second time in two months


Maruti Suzuki, India’s largest carmaker, said Tuesday it will increase prices across its vehicle lineup by up to 30,000 rupees ($312) from August, citing persistent cost pressures.

The increase marks the company’s second portfolio-wide price rise in about two months. Maruti Suzuki previously announced a similar increase of up to 30,000 rupees effective from June, while offering price protection on some entry-level models.

The automaker said continued inflation and higher input costs had made it necessary to pass on part of the additional expenses to customers.

The company said the renewed conflict in the Middle East has disrupted global trade routes and energy markets, pushing up the cost of key raw materials and other inputs.

Maruti Suzuki joins several other major Indian automakers that have raised prices this year. Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles has implemented two price increases, while Mahindra & Mahindra and Hyundai Motor India have each announced one.

Shares of Maruti Suzuki ended Tuesday’s trading session 0.6% higher at 13,597 rupees after recovering from earlier losses.

ICE Mandates Dress Code After Killings and Botched Arrest

0
ice-mandates-dress-code-after-killings-and-botched-arrest
ICE Mandates Dress Code After Killings and Botched Arrest


Following a pair of deadly shootings by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, the division of the agency responsible for street arrests and deportations issued a new policy mandating a dress code for field operations.

The nationwide policy, shared with The Intercept by a Department of Homeland Security whistleblower and confirmed by multiple ICE officers, details a new set of appearance standards aimed at making it easier for the public and fellow law enforcement officials to recognize ICE officers in the field.

“Law enforcement officers performing field operations shall wear readily identifiable ICE attire, including a ballistic vest during high-visibility operations,” says a guidance memo signed by Acting ICE Director David Venturella. “Appropriate field attire includes khaki or coyote brown tactical type pants, paired with an ICE polo, or dark blue or black polo.”

The memo adds, “Clothing such as jeans, sweatshirts, hoodies, non-collared shirts, or apparel displaying graphics or screen prints is not authorized during field operations.”

The new directives for ICE’s Employee Code of Conduct came in the wake of a botched arrest last week in Las Vegas by two ICE officers wearing hooded sweatshirts, with one attempting to pull a hood down over his face as onlookers recorded video. (ICE did not respond to a request for comment.)

The officer attempting to make the arrest “looked like a kidnapper,” said one ICE official who spoke to The Intercept on the condition of anonymity to protect their livelihood.

“Ending the era of ICE agents making arrests in hoodies and unbranded street clothes is a long-overdue admission that unidentifiable immigration enforcement is dangerous, instills fear, and erodes public trust,” Nick Wilson, the senior director of public safety policy at Center for American Progress, told The Intercept. “Real public safety requires holding federal agents to the exact same standards of visibility, training, state and local oversight, and independent investigations of civil rights violations as local law enforcement.”

“Ending the era of ICE agents making arrests in hoodies and unbranded street clothes is a long-overdue admission that unidentifiable immigration enforcement is dangerous.”

Along with the use of masks, ICE officers’ failure to clearly identify themselves amid arrests and other enforcement actions have drawn criticisms from the public and raised the ire of elected officials. Attorneys general have pleaded with Congress to pass legislation requiring that ICE officers wear identifying insignia, and members of Congress have themselves urged ICE to require officers better identify themselves to the public.

Botched Las Vegas Arrest

The new dress code, two ICE officials told The Intercept, came in direct response to the recent fatal ICE shootings in Texas and Maine and the botched arrest attempt by two plainclothes ICE officers on July 13 at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas.

“It’s because of the incident that happened in Las Vegas,” said the ICE official.

Video of the Las Vegas airport incident, recorded by a bystander, shows two people in hooded sweatshirts tackling a man in the middle of a busy terminal. After passersby draw near, the officers abandoned the arrest but left the man handcuffed on one hand. The man tackled in the video, later identified as Phu Nguyen, a 57-year-old Australian national who allegedly overstayed his visa, was arrested by ICE the following day at Los Angeles International Airport.

“It blew all our minds,” the ICE official said. “It didn’t look professional. They didn’t present a badge when they initiated.”

The new ICE dress code policy mandates that all arresting officers must clearly display an ICE badge while conducting arrests.

“During low-visibility operations, the ICE badge must remain visible at the time of arrest.” the policy says.

Another ICE official, who also cited the Las Vegas airport incident, said a wave of new ICE recruits and relaxed training standards had contributed to the lack of professionalism.

“What an embarrassment the Vegas video was,” said the second ICE official, who also requested anonymity. “Those two fucking clowns should’ve been immediately fired. Half these fucking new DOs” — deportation officers — “don’t even know the basics of immigration law or how to process an alien. They hired a bunch of fucking clowns and they look sloppy as shit.”

In a statement to the press, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson blamed bystanders for the botched arrest in Vegas.

“As officers attempted to arrest Nguyen, a crowd of anti-ICE agitators surrounded officers,” the statement said. “To de-escalate the situation and for officer safety, officers did not proceed with the arrest.”

According to ICE officials who spoke to The Intercept, the new dress code could be the first step toward a major shift in ICE’s long-standing status as a plainclothes agency.

“I would say the writing’s on the wall,” said one ICE official. “I wouldn’t be surprised if we go to a uniformed agency.”

A propagandistic Voice of America hands strategic victory to adversaries

0
a-propagandistic-voice-of-america-hands-strategic-victory-to-adversaries
A propagandistic Voice of America hands strategic victory to adversaries

The war with Iran is driving fuel shortages and inflation around the world, deepening anti-American sentiment at a time when international confidence in the United States is already in decline. A June Pew survey found unfavorable views of the  rising across 36 countries.

This is precisely the moment Washington needs credible international broadcasting to explain its policies through fact-based journalism. Yet, after failing to silence the Voice of America, the taxpayer-funded independent international broadcaster, the Trump administration is transforming it into a government mouthpiece. 

In doing so, the administration is not only breaking the law; it is handing Tehran, Moscow, and Beijing a strategic victory as they ramp up their own global influence operations. A shuttered VOA cedes the information space to America’s adversaries. A propagandistic VOA advances their disinformation campaigns and forfeits the trust of the 360 millionpeople who used to tune in to its broadcasts each week.

Current editorial priorities bear many of the characteristics of wartime propaganda, including at VOA Farsi, one of only six of VOA’s 49 language services brought back in a much-reduced capacity following legal action against the administration.

Stories center on administration statements, often without opposing context. Recent articles highlight administration claims that oil prices are lower than before the war and that maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has been restored. Meanwhile, VOA suppressed coverageof civilian death tolls from airstrikes and barely mentioned the February bombing of the elementary school in Minab.

This reporting bears little resemblance to VOA’s journalism that until March 2025 was guided by the VOA Charter. This 1976 law enshrines editorial independence by mandating three things: VOA will serve as a consistently reliable and authoritative source of news; VOA will represent America, not any single segment of American society; and VOA will present  policies clearly and effectively, with responsible discussions and opinion on those policies.

That means covering  military objectives and declarations of success alongside critics’ scrutiny of those claims, the war’s humanitarian consequences, and its cost to American taxpayers. Statements from the administration alongside lawmakers, analysts, activists, Trump supporters, and the majority of Americans who oppose the war. It also means including Tehran’s position, the voices of Iranian civilians and diaspora groups, international reactions, and the complex history of -Iran ties.

Little of that is evident in VOA’s reporting today.

Those steering the agency away from objective journalism may be tempted by what they see as an immediate payoff: making  military operations appear more successful, and amplifying the president’s message.

In reality, this approach undermines  interests from the outset. Narratives that contradict audiences’ lived reality are unlikely to persuade them. Iranians feel the war’s impact in their daily lives. People across Africa and Asia feel it in their wallets.

Even if some are persuaded, any short-term messaging advantage would be outweighed by the broader loss of credibility. Once audiences see that VOA serves the administration rather than the truth, they are less likely to trust its reporting on anything else, whether it’s the war in Ukraine or Gaza, the earthquake response in Venezuela, even something as indisputable as World Cup scores.

This trust can only be sustained if VOA continues to produce journalism, not propaganda. Unlike Russian and Chinese state media which can broadcast their governments’ consistent political narratives, a  broadcaster that echoes its administration may need to change its message every four years, sacrificing credibility every time.

The VOA Charter states: “The long-range interests of the United States are served by communicating directly with the peoples of the world…” This emphasis on long-range interests transcends administrations, and it has worked: more than 80 percent of VOA’s global audience found its reporting trustworthy.

‘We shall tell you the truth

VOA made a promise to audiences in its first broadcast in 1942: “The news may be good for us. The news may be bad. But we shall tell you the truth.” This has repeatedly proven to be the right course of action, even when the news is devastating.

In March 2012,  Staff Sergeant Robert Bales killed 16 Afghan civilians in a shooting spree in Kandahar. The killing, reported by VOA,made the area “a very difficult place to operate in,” said Jason Church, a retired  Army captain and Purple Heart recipient deployed in Afghanistan at the time. Yet, he views VOA’s coverage in Pashto, Dari, Urdu, Farsi and other languages of the region as essential, because without it the only message the people would hear is from “an angry [Afghan President Hamid] Karzai and the Taliban.”

Reporting bad news is not “anti-American,” as Project 2025 claimed in its chapter on USAGM. On the contrary, journalism that reflects a nation unafraid of scrutiny embodies the very best of American ideals. For more than eight decades, VOA reports carried an implicit message: A strong nation is one willing to tell the truth about itself. That message, more than any government talking point, has made VOA one of America’s most effective instruments of soft power that is too valuable to squander.

This commitment to truth – applying the same journalistic standards to every administration and every government including its own – is what distinguished VOA from state-controlled broadcasters such as China Media Group, Russia Today, and Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.

RAND researchers describe RT’s approach as a “firehose of falsehood”: high-volume, repetitive messaging unconstrained by objective reality or consistency. Rather than persuading audiences through credibility, this model seeks to overwhelm the information environment, and erode trust by making the truth seem unknowable.

The RAND study also suggests that if audiences have already been primed with accurate information, disinformation becomes less persuasive. As outlined in the now-abandoned USAGM’s 2022-2026 Strategic Plan, that is precisely VOA’s goal: to be “extremely capable first responders in the current war on truth.”

Why abandon that goal? Turning VOA into a propaganda outlet will not help the administration control the narrative; it will only serve adversaries’ purpose of making all information seem unreliable. With a silenced VOA, the  unilaterally disarms in the global information war. With a propagandistic VOA, it arms its adversaries.

This July marks the 50th anniversary of the VOA Charter. It is time to return to it.

Patsy Widakuswara is a former VOA White House bureau chief who has been a lead plaintiff against the administration’s attempt to dismantle the agency. The views expressed here are her own and do not reflect the views of her employer. This article is republished with permission from Stephen Herman’s Substack Newsguy.

Sony releases one last trailer for Spider-Man: Brand New Day

0
sony-releases-one-last-trailer-for-spider-man:-brand-new-day
Sony releases one last trailer for Spider-Man: Brand New Day

The Odyssey might be cleaning up at the box office at the moment, but in two weeks another mega-blockbuster hits theaters: Spider-Man: Brand New Day, directed by Destin Daniel Cretton (Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings). Sony Pictures dropped one last trailer for this follow-up to 2021’s No Way Home, which is purportedly intended to launch a fresh trilogy of films with Tom Holland in the title role.

No Way Home ended on a pretty bleak note, with Peter Parker (Holland) asking Doctor Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) to erase him from everyone’s memory to protect the multiverse, including his girlfriend MJ (Zendaya). Per the official synopsis:

It’s a Brand New Day for Peter Parker. Fighting crime full-time as Spider-Man in a world that doesn’t remember him—and the pressure of seeing his old friends move on without him—sparks a change in Peter he may not have the power to control. But that transformation might also be the only thing that can stop a shocking new threat to the city and those he loves–a powerful villain no one can even see. The world may have forgotten Peter Parker, but he hasn’t forgotten them.

Holland is reprising his role as Peter Parker/Spider-Man, along with Zendaya as MJ and Jacob Batalon as Peter’s former bestie Ned Leeds. The film also features Jon Bernthal as Frank Castle/Punisher, Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner/Hulk, Michael Mando as Mac Gargan/Scorpion (captured by Spider-Man in Homecoming), Marvin Jones III as albino crime lord Lonnie Lincoln/Tombstone, Charlie Cox as Matt Murdock/Daredevil (briefly Peter’s lawyer in No Way Home); Liza Colon-Zayas as detective Jean DeWolf; Eman Esfandi as MJ’s new boyfriend; and Trammell Tillman as Bill Metzger of the Department of Damage Control (DODC) who is policing superpowered individuals.

Sadie Sink will also appear in an as-yet-undisclosed role, although we know she’s likely playing the main villain, and Zabryna Guevara will reprise her Daredevil: Born Again role as Sheila Rivera. We may also see Florence Pugh’s Yelena, and the comic book characters Boomerang, Tarantula, and Ramrod, because we can’t just have a simple, straightforward superhero story anymore, it seems.

This final trailer focuses on how Peter/Spidey got here, giving us a few highlights from the prior trilogy—including the tearful farewell between Peter and MJ, in which he vows to come find her. But when he does track MJ down, working in a diner, he loses his nerve and just orders a coffee.

The second half of the trailer focuses on all the action we can expect from Brand New Day—including Banner hulking out (“No Banner. Only Hulk”), Spidey’s battle with members of the Hand (“Can we do this one at a time, please?), and another glimpse of that mysterious cloaked figure. While we do see Mando’s Scorpion, that might not actually be the real Scorpion, given that this new threat Peter faces can take on the form of anyone.  At least we get to see Spidey swinging through the city with MJ in his arms again, after she agrees to trust his warning that she’s in danger. Bonus points for Ned’s spiffy Spidey-tracker app.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day hits theaters on July 31, 2026.

Actress Dead at 18 After Horror Crash

0
actress-dead-at-18-after-horror-crash
Actress Dead at 18 After Horror Crash


Kaylee Hottle, the young actress who won over audiences in the Godzilla vs. Kong films, has died at just 18 years old after a devastating car crash in Maryland.

The actress, best known for playing Jia in Godzilla vs. Kong and Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire, was fatally injured in the early hours of July 21 after the car she was riding in veered off a road in Ijamsville, Maryland, and slammed into a culvert, according to officials.

The Frederick County Sheriff’s Office said Hottle was one of two passengers inside a 1995 Honda Accord traveling on Windsor Road when the 19-year-old driver lost control.

According to the sheriff’s office, the vehicle “traveled off the right side of the two-lane roadway and struck a culvert.”

Investigators said “excessive speed is believed to be a contributing factor in the collision.”

The driver was taken to a hospital with injuries that were not considered life-threatening. The other passenger reportedly refused medical treatment at the scene.

Hottle, however, suffered catastrophic injuries and was rushed to a local trauma center, where she was later pronounced dead.

The crash remains under investigation.

The tragedy quickly sent shockwaves through fans of the MonsterVerse films, where Hottle made a memorable impression as Jia, a young deaf girl who shared a powerful bond with Kong and communicated with him through sign language.

For many viewers, Hottle was the emotional heart of the franchise.

Her father, Joshua, later shared the crushing news in a livestream titled, “I am taking a flight that I never would like to take.”

In the emotional video, he explained in American Sign Language that he was flying from Texas to claim his daughter’s body after receiving the kind of phone call no parent ever wants to answer.

Joshua said officials told him Kaylee’s heart had stopped while she was being transported to the hospital following the crash.

Hottle’s death is especially heartbreaking because she had already become an important figure for deaf representation on the big screen.

The young actress, who was deaf, broke through in 2021’s Godzilla vs. Kong, playing Jia opposite stars including Rebecca Hall, Brian Tyree Henry, Millie Bobby Brown, and Alexander Skarsgård.

She returned for the 2024 sequel, Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire, once again portraying the character whose connection with Kong gave the blockbuster franchise an emotional center.

Before her Hollywood breakthrough, Hottle appeared in commercials for products used by the deaf and hard of hearing community.

Her casting was widely praised because Jia was not just a side character in a giant-monster spectacle. She was central to the story, serving as one of the few humans who could understand Kong and connect with him in a deeply personal way.

Hottle once opened up about the challenges of bringing the role to life, explaining that the script had to be translated into American Sign Language with help from her parents and another person.

In a 2021 interview with The Daily Moth, she said memorizing her signed lines was not the hardest part. The bigger challenge came when spoken dialogue had to be translated into ASL in a way that actually made sense.

“I was fine with memorizing the script and signing my lines, but the tough part was signing out the ‘spoken’ parts because we had to change it, and sometimes they’d tell us it was wrong but they didn’t understand that ASL changes almost everything,” she said.

She explained that what appeared simple on the page often had to be changed once it was translated visually.

“Because the interpreter said what I said. The producer and director would sometimes say ‘Don’t say that’ and want me to follow the script, but the signs for that sentence would be different in ASL,” Hottle said.

She recalled one misunderstanding involving ASL translation that delayed production, though she said the crew eventually understood.

Hottle also became a teacher on set, helping cast and crew members better understand how to communicate with deaf people.

“They had never interacted with a deaf person before,” she said. “I had to explain how to sign and use facial expressions. That was the hard part, but when they picked up on it, it was fine. I didn’t really have challenges, they were very accommodating. Some of the workers learned how to sign.”

The actress described Jia’s relationship with Kong as something rare and meaningful.

“Because Kong and my character had a special bond,” she said. “We signed with each other. Not with Godzilla, it was different.”

Her performance did not go unnoticed.

Alexander Skarsgård, one of her Godzilla vs. Kong co-stars, praised Hottle at the time and called her a “scene stealer.”

That praise followed her long after the movie’s release, as fans continued to point to Jia as one of the most memorable human characters in the franchise.

Now, the young actress’s life and career have been cut tragically short just as she was entering adulthood.

Hottle was only 18.

President Trump Warns of Possible Strike on Iran’s Fortified Pickaxe Mountain

0
president-trump-warns-of-possible-strike-on-iran’s-fortified-pickaxe-mountain
President Trump Warns of Possible Strike on Iran’s Fortified Pickaxe Mountain


President Donald Trump said Tuesday that the United States is likely to strike Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain “pretty soon” and “very heavily,” escalating his rhetoric as the US-Iran war entered its 10th day.  

Speaking during a White House meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Trump described Pickaxe Mountain as a possible location for Iranian centrifuges and said Washington was closely tracking Iran’s nuclear-related activity. 

Trump said reports that centrifuges may have been moved there were not confirmed and argued that centrifuges alone would not be decisive without access to nuclear material. “We follow the material,” he said, suggesting the administration’s focus is on preventing Iran from restoring any pathway toward weapons-grade enrichment. He also said Iran could be trying to reconstitute nuclear infrastructure and warned that any site connected to such efforts could face powerful US action. 

The comments marked a more forceful posture than Trump’s earlier suggestions that a negotiated end to the conflict remained possible. On Tuesday, he said the United States had “no interest in meeting” with Iran for now, while insisting that Washington was “not finished at all” with its military campaign. Axios reported that Trump’s remarks indicate he is leaning away from a ceasefire and toward a broader effort, potentially alongside Israel, to compel Tehran to yield. 

Pickaxe Mountain has become a central focus because it is believed to contain heavily protected underground tunnel complexes near Natanz, one of Iran’s main nuclear-enrichment areas. Its depth and fortification could make it a difficult target, though a strike could still seek to damage entrances and disrupt operations. 

 

Nintendo says users voluntarily paid higher prices, have no right to tariff refunds

0
nintendo-says-users-voluntarily-paid-higher-prices,-have-no-right-to-tariff-refunds
Nintendo says users voluntarily paid higher prices, have no right to tariff refunds

Nintendo urged a court to dismiss a lawsuit demanding that it pass tariff refunds on to customers, saying that people who bought a Switch console or other products have no legal right to refunds that Nintendo is due to receive from the government.

Nintendo said in a motion to dismiss yesterday that plaintiffs are “ask[ing] this Court to invent a legal duty out of whole cloth to retroactively re-price completed sales simply because the legal landscape has changed.” Nintendo said the plaintiffs “have no legal entitlement to the tariff refunds Nintendo stands to receive.”

The lawsuit was filed in April by two customers who seek to represent a class of all US residents who bought Nintendo products from February 2025 to February 2026. California resident Gregory Hoffert and Washington resident Prashant Sharan filed the class action complaint in US District Court for the Western District of Washington, alleging unjust enrichment and a violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act’s prohibition on unfair or deceptive acts.

“Nintendo engaged in unfair acts by: (i) raising prices due to tariffs; (ii) failing to disclose that it intended to seek tariff refunds; and (iii) retaining tariff refunds despite having passed the costs to its customers,” the lawsuit alleged. In their unjust-enrichment claim, plaintiffs said Nintendo profits were “unjustly obtained as a result of its price increases on goods subject to unlawful tariffs.” Nintendo raised prices for the original Switch console by $30 to $50 and added $5 to $10 to the prices of various Switch 2 accessories.

Nintendo told the court that “the doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply when a party voluntarily pays a purchase price and receives a product in return.” Nintendo said plaintiffs “received exactly what they paid for: Nintendo products that Plaintiffs knowingly and voluntarily purchased at the advertised price. Nor is there anything ‘unjust’ about Nintendo retaining money that it may receive from the government as tariff refunds. The fact that Nintendo stands to receive tariff refunds does not give Plaintiffs any legal entitlement to those funds.”

Consumers paid price of Trump tariffs

A similar lawsuit was filed in May against Sony by plaintiffs who bought PlayStation consoles. Sony has not yet filed a motion to dismiss that case, which is in the Northern District of California, but is likely to fight it using similar legal reasoning as Nintendo’s. Another lawsuit seeking tariff refunds for Xbox buyers was filed against Microsoft on July 17.

Many companies raised prices in response to tariffs imposed by President Trump. In February, the Supreme Court ruled that Trump illegally imposed the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs, and the lengthy refund process began in April.

Trump imposed another round of tariffs after the Supreme Court ruling, and those tariffs were judged to be illegal by the US Court of International Trade. Ordinary residents of the US have paid the price of Trump’s trade war.

“As it stands, Defendant has retained profits generated from its sales of products subject to tariff-related price increases and should not be permitted to retain those ill-gotten profits when it is seeking a refund of the duties it paid,” the lawsuit against Nintendo said.

It’s easy to see why consumers are angry about having paid tariff-inflated prices. The government isn’t issuing refunds to any resident who indirectly paid for Trump’s tariffs. The government refund portal set up after the Supreme Court ruling is for importers and authorized customs brokers.

Over 100 tariff lawsuits against businesses

Nintendo is one of many companies that sued the Trump administration in an attempt to make sure the government doesn’t worm its way out of issuing refunds. The class action against Nintendo pointed to this lawsuit as evidence that “Nintendo stands to receive a windfall: it has already recouped tariff costs from consumers through higher prices, and it now stands in line to recover those same unlawful tariff payments from the federal government.”

Lawsuits seeking refunds from companies aren’t just being filed against gaming console makers. Since the Supreme Court ruling, “plaintiffs’ firms have filed more than 100 putative consumer class actions against businesses nationwide that have sought refunds of tariffs paid as a result of these now invalidated charges,” said a July 9 article by Foley & Lardner lawyers. These cases have been filed in more than 30 federal districts in over 20 states, they wrote.

The legal theory behind the lawsuits is not specific to any industry. “Plaintiffs have filed class actions against companies across varying industries and points in the supply chain from food manufacturers to logistics providers. The specific allegations in each case differ, but the primary legal theory is the same: companies cannot pass tariff costs to consumers and retain government refunds for the same tariffs,” Foley & Lardner lawyers Erik Swanholt and Kelsey Boehm wrote.

Holland & Knight lawyers wrote in a legal alert that “any business that both passed tariff costs through to customers and is pursuing government refunds could become a litigation target.”

Nintendo tries to compel arbitration

With lawsuits in the early stages, no court has ruled on the core legal theories, Holland & Knight lawyers wrote. Businesses have several potential defenses, such as arguing that there can be no unjust enrichment when there is a contract between the parties.

“In many jurisdictions, unjust enrichment is unavailable where an express contract governs the parties’ relationship,” Holland & Knight partners Ashley Akers and Austin Rainwater wrote.

Businesses can also argue “that the challenged charges were imposed while the IEEPA tariffs remained legally effective and enforceable,” the Holland & Knight alert said. “According to this view, the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision invalidating the tariffs does not necessarily render charges collected before that decision unlawful or create a retroactive obligation to refund amounts previously paid.”

Although the lawsuit against Nintendo did not allege breach of contract, the Holland & Knight alert said some of the tariff cases make this claim. “This is the principal claim in many shipping and logistics cases. Plaintiffs allege that tariff-related surcharges were not authorized under applicable shipping agreements, terms of service or tariff schedules,” the law firm said.

Companies are likely to ask courts to enforce mandatory arbitration provisions contained in their terms and conditions, and Nintendo has already done so. Nintendo filed a motion to compel arbitration with Hoffert because of evidence that he “affirmatively accepted contractual agreements with Nintendo at least twice.” Nintendo said in its motion to dismiss that it “expressly reserves the right to move to compel Mr. Sharan’s claims to arbitration if discovery reveals his claims are arbitrable.”

Ryanair CEO: initial probe suggests foreign object damage in smashed window incident

0
ryanair-ceo:-initial-probe-suggests-foreign-object-damage-in-smashed-window-incident
Ryanair CEO: initial probe suggests foreign object damage in smashed window incident


Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary said that an initial finding from a probe into an incident ​in which a passenger was partly sucked out of ‌a Boeing 737’s roken window suggested “foreign object damage” and was not due to the aircraft’s age or servicing conditions.

The U.S. National Transportation ​Safety Board is investigating the July 10 incident, in which ​a piece of engine broke off the aircraft and ⁠smashed the window shortly after takeoff from Thessaloniki in ​Greece, according to video and the Federal Aviation Administration. The ​plane, headed to Germany, lost pressure and made an emergency landing.

“Initial indication would suggest it looks like a foreign object damage to the ​engine on takeoff at Thessaloniki, but we don’t have, we ​can’t say that definitively,” O’Leary told analysts after Ryanair’s results for the April-June ‌quarter.

O’Leary ⁠said the aircraft was 18 years old and its engine had been fully serviced and overhauled within the last two years. He added that a draft report on the incident ​would be ​issued in about ⁠28 days, followed by a more detailed report.

The event, which had echoes of two Southwest ​Airlines b Boeing 737 NG flights in 2016 ​and 2018, ⁠prompted a re-evaluation of the response to those incidents, FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford told Reuters last week.

Confirmation that damage was ⁠caused by ​an external object could reduce Boeing’s ​and Ryanair’s responsibilities over the incident.

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
- Advertisement -
Google search engine

Recent Posts