16.5 C
London
Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Home Blog

Hezbollah Accepts US-Backed Ceasefire With Israel

0
hezbollah-accepts-us-backed-ceasefire-with-israel
Hezbollah Accepts US-Backed Ceasefire With Israel


The Lebanese Embassy in Washington released a statement that “authorities received confirmation of Hezbollah’s agreement to the US proposal calling for a mutual cessation of attacks.”

Hezbollah has agreed to a US proposal for a ceasefire with Israel, according to an announcement by the Lebanese presidency citing the Lebanese Embassy in Washington.

According to the statement, the discussions included communications between Lebanese President General Joseph Aoun and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

The Lebanese Embassy in Washington said authorities in Beirut received confirmation that Hezbollah had accepted a US-backed proposal calling for a reciprocal halt to attacks.

An embassy statement said that “within the framework of the efforts undertaken by the Lebanese state to preserve stability and spare Lebanon from further escalation … Lebanese authorities received confirmation of Hezbollah’s agreement to the US proposal calling for a mutual cessation of attacks.”

“Under the proposed arrangement, Israeli strikes on the southern suburbs of Beirut would cease in exchange for Hezbollah refraining from carrying out attacks against Israel, with the scope of the ceasefire subsequently being expanded to encompass the entirety of Lebanese territory,” the statement continued.

The embassy added that President Donald Trump spoke with Lebanon’s ambassador to the United States, Nada Maawad, and informed her that he had obtained the agreement of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the proposed framework. Maawad then relayed the outcome of the discussions to President Aoun, who subsequently passed the information on to Hezbollah, according to the statement.

The embassy’s statement followed a Truth Social post by President Trump announcing an end to the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah.

President Trump wrote that he had a “very productive conversation” with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He added: “Likewise, through highly placed representatives, I had a very good call with Hezbollah, and they agreed that all shooting will stop—that Israel will not attack them, and they will not attack Israel.”

Regarding Iran, President Trump also said negotiations aimed at ending the conflict with the Islamic Republic were advancing quickly.

In a brief post on Truth Social, Trump wrote: “Talks are continuing, at a rapid pace, with the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

The president’s posts on Monday followed an announcement by Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz that Israel’s military would advance operations in Lebanon to target Hezbollah infrastructure.

“There will be no situation in which Hezbollah attacks our cities and citizens while the terror headquarters in Dahieh remain off-limits,” Netanyahu said in a video statement.

He added that Israeli forces were expanding operations in southern Lebanon and targeting Hezbollah infrastructure.

“We are continuing to deepen our operations on the ground in southern Lebanon, eliminating Hezbollah strongholds. Hezbollah is on the run. We are determined to restore security to the residents of the north, just as we did for the residents of the south,” Netanyahu said.

Israel had previously refrained from striking the Lebanese capital at the request of the Trump administration.

Speaking separately at a military ceremony, Katz said the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) was continuing both air and ground operations against Hezbollah and achieving “significant gains” against the group.

“If there is no quiet in the north, there will be no quiet in Beirut … We will not allow a situation in which our communities and citizens are harmed while calm is maintained in Beirut,” Katz said.

Katz said the military’s objective is to “turn the Litani area into a zone under IDF security control, free of weapons and terrorists.”

Following Netanyahu’s and Katz’s stated intention to expand military operations in Lebanon, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned on Monday that Israel’s expanding military campaign against Hezbollah would violate the ceasefire.

In a post on X, Araghchi wrote: “The ceasefire between Iran and the US is unequivocally a ceasefire on all fronts, including in Lebanon,” adding that a violation on one front would be considered a violation on all fronts.

He warned: “The US and Israel are responsible for the consequences of any violation.”

Why cats prefer silver vine to catnip and other May highlights

0
why-cats-prefer-silver-vine-to-catnip-and-other-may-highlights
Why cats prefer silver vine to catnip and other May highlights

It’s a regrettable reality that there is never enough time to cover all the interesting scientific stories we come across. So every month, we highlight a handful of the best stories that nearly slipped through the cracks. May’s list includes the discovery of a possible prehistoric mining site in the Pyrenees; a new species of tiny blue octopus; why cats seem to prefer silver vine to catnip; and why political polarization might behave like a phase transition, among other noteworthy stories.

Prehistoric mining in the Pyrenees

Archaeological excavation works at Cova 338

Credit: IPHES-CERCA

High in the eastern Pyrenees is a prehistoric cave, excavated between 2021 and 2023. Based on analysis of artifacts uncovered at the site, a team of Spanish archaeologists believes this may have served as an ancient copper smelting spot, with far more frequent occupation by humans than previously thought. The researchers described these preliminary findings in a paper published in the journal Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology.

Of particular interest were 23 hearths found in the second and third layers of the excavation, filled with crushed green mineral fragments that had clearly been subject to burning; other materials found there showed no sign of thermal damage. The team is still conducting experiments to conclusively identify the green material, but the fragments strongly resemble malachite. That’s significant because malachite can be heated to produce copper.  Most of the hearths are between 4,000 and 5,500 years old. The team also recovered two prehistoric pendants, a human finger bone, and a baby tooth belonging to a child about 11 years old. It’s possible there may be burials in deeper layers as excavations continue at the site.

Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology, 2026. DOI: 10. 3389/fearc.2026.1811493 (About DOIs).

Singing mice

This singing mouse species (Scotinomys teguina) thrives in the cloud forests of Costa Rica.

Credit: NYU School of Medicine

Singing mice live high in the cloud forests of Costa Rica, engaging in chirping call-and-response duets that can change slightly depending on responses received. In 2019, scientists pinpointed the precise brain circuit responsible for this behavior. Now, scientists at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) have discovered that this ability doesn’t require any major evolutionary leap in brain complexity, just a couple of targeted changes to existing wiring patterns, according to a paper published in Nature.

The key to the discovery was a molecular barcoding technique developed by CSHL’s Anthony Zador, which enabled the team to map out the wiring of thousands of individual neurons in the brains of singing mice and other closely related species. This revealed that there were roughly triple the number of neurons connecting the mouth-movement control region with the cortex that controls hearing, and a midbrain structure that controls vocalizations. The authors suggest it might one day be possible to make an ordinary lab mouse “sing” by making similar neural wiring changes.

Nature, 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10458-y.

Tiny blue octopus

Screen grab of the octopus from the ROV footage

Credit: Courtesy of the Charles Darwin Foundation

In 2015, scientists on a deep-sea expedition in the Galapagos Islands, aboard the E/V Nautilus, were looking at footage from the remotely operated vehicle (ROV). They spotted a tiny, distinctly blue octopus some 5,800 feet (1,773 meters) below the surface, and collected the creature for further analysis, along with other deep-sea specimens. Charles Darwin Foundation researchers have now concluded that the adorable creature, small enough to fit into the palm of one’s hand, is a new species, according to a paper published in the journal Zootaxis.

The little octopus has been preserved in storage since it was collected. Scientists were reluctant to cut the specimen open for a thorough analysis to determine the species, since it was one of a kind, and it was extremely unlikely that another would be collected. Instead, the team opted for mini-CT scans, enabling a 3D virtual dissection with clear imaging even of soft tissues. This revealed that the creature had short arms, few arm suckers, and no ink sac, as well as having very smooth skin and a large rachidian tooth. They’ve dubbed the new species Microeledone galapagensis.

Zootaxis, 2026. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5814.4.

Not all “slapsticks” are created equal

Foley artists have used so-called “slapsticks” to mimic the sound of the crack of the whip since at least the mid-20th century; it’s used in Leroy Anderson’s holiday classic “Sleigh Ride,” for example. But not all commercial slapsticks are created equal, according to Daniel Ludwigsen of Kettering University, who presented the results of his preliminary experiments comparing five versions at a meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in Philadelphia. Ludwigsen played each of the five commercial slapsticks five times in an anechoic environment, minimizing any acoustic room effects with absorbing wedges.

All shared a high-frequency roll-off and a broad peak between 1,000 and 3,000 Hz, with varying degrees of low-frequency roll-off. The two smallest could be played with one hand thanks to a spring hinge and performed best in the high-frequency range. By contrast, longer models like the “Sleighride Special” performed best in low-frequency ranges. The resulting sound’s tone is influenced by how hard one smacks the sticks together. And preliminary testing of the Pearl slapstick showed roughly uniform sound directionality regardless of frequency, although Ludwigsen emphasized that a more complete study is needed.

The hidden math of abstract art

Taste in art is highly subjective, and understanding why some works resonate with the public more than others has long fascinated researchers. Mathematicians think they have identified a hidden “golden rule” of abstract art that might account for why we gravitate toward a Jackson Pollock while lesser works leave us cold, according to a paper published in the journal PLoS Computational Biology. The researchers developed a new analytical method for art, drawing on a computational topology technique that captures structure on multiple scales (“persistent homology”).

They applied this method to a set of abstract paintings by well-known artists and also to a second set of AI-generated “pseudo-art.” Their method could clearly distinguish between the two. Further analysis revealed that works by Pollock, Wassily Kandinsky, and Mark Rothko shared a similar balance of visual elements at the edges (specifically the Alexander duality).

They also conducted experiments that tracked people’s eye movements and recorded their brain activity as they viewed sets of images—both in the lab and in a gallery. There was more stable integrative brain processing when people looked at real art versus pseudo-art, and the eye movements mapped neatly onto the previously identified topological features, suggesting a link between topologically derived image features, eye movement, and aesthetic experience.

PLoS Computational Biology, 2026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014156.

Political polarization is a phase transition

Schematic illustration of the model of voters influenced by homophily and election campaign.

Credit: Complexity Science Hub (CSH)

It’s usually assumed that the candidate who spends the most has an electoral advantage, but physics suggests the reality is more complex. Scientists at the Complexity Science Hub (CSH) have found that political polarization behaves like a phase transition, according to a paper published in Physical Review Letters, marked by a critical campaign spending threshold. Below that threshold, social dynamics shape the outcome; exceeding that threshold deepens polarization without significantly increasing the margin of victory.

The CSH team used a statistical physics model to examine bipartisan elections, specifically 6,357 House races (with just two main candidates) spanning 435 congressional districts and 21 election cycles (1980 to 2020). They found that the tipping point is $1.8 million at the district level. (Senate and presidential campaigns have higher absolute spending.) When both parties spend less than that, community interactions shape the outcome. If just one party spends more than that, the campaign gains a decisive edge, drowning out the influence of community interactions. But if both campaigns exceed the threshold, both social influence and high spending become negligible.

Spending more and more doesn’t change the outcome, which usually falls into the 50:50 range. But it does significantly increase polarization. The authors found that the incumbency advantage is also very real, at least in the intermediate spending range. Any challenger must spend about $140,000 to unseat an incumbent, even if said incumbent spends nothing, given the baseline advantage. The scientists hope to extend their analysis to multi-party systems in European democracies to learn more about these dynamics.

Physical Review Letters, 2026. DOI: 10.1103/9gjj-1df6.

Do cats prefer silver vine or catnip?

tabby cat rolling around in silver vine leaves

Credit: Reiko Uenoyama

All domestic cats love catnip, right? Well, not necessarily. Japanese cat owners would likely say their cats prefer silver vine (matatabi), which is equally famous for triggering the usual strong kitty response: rubbing their faces and bodies all over it, rolling on the ground, or licking and chewing the leaves. Japanese researchers have conducted several studies and concluded that cats actually have a significant preference for silver vine even though catnip contains more active compounds, according to a paper published in the Journal of Chemical Ecology

First, the team placed fresh silver vine branches and leaves near living catnip plants in a garden and monitored six free-roaming cats over 10 nights. Five cats responded to the silver vine while none responded to the fresh catnip. Repeating the experiment with catnip and silver vine extracts produced similar results. The researchers then tested 22 captive purebred cats with the extracts and found that 15 chose the silver vine, three chose the catnip, one responded to both, and the remaining three cats weren’t interested in either.

There was a clear preference for silver vine even though the amount of bioactive compounds in the catnip extract was 170 times higher than in the silver vine, according to the authors. They suggest that the odors of living catnip might be too strong and intense, which might explain why commercial catnip is usually sold in a dry-leaf form. There is even some historical anecdotal evidence that this is the case: in 1768, botanist Philip Miller wrote in The Gardeners Dictionary that cats were fond of catnip “when it is withered,” but often ignored it when there was a lot of catnip growing in a cluster.

Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-026-01717-3.

New York Comptroller’s Trip to Israel Raised Ethical Concerns, State Commission Said

0
new-york-comptroller’s-trip-to-israel-raised-ethical-concerns,-state-commission-said
New York Comptroller’s Trip to Israel Raised Ethical Concerns, State Commission Said


A New York state oversight board raised ethics concerns about a trip by state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli to Israel that a local pro-Israel Jewish group sponsored.

The revelation comes amid renewed scrutiny of DiNapoli’s spending spree on Israel Bonds, a financial instrument that directly funds the state of Israel. DiNapoli, the administrator of New York pension funds, is facing his first primary fight in 18 years as comptroller, and the branded, non-tradeable assets have become an issue in the race.

The trip was paid for by the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, which has a financial relationship to Israel Bonds, the organization that issues Israeli government debt securities in the U.S.

According to an itinerary of the trip, DiNapoli was slated to meet with Israel Bonds staffers.

In a February 2, 2024, letter to the comptroller, the New York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government approved reimbursement for DiNapoli by the JCRC, but raised concerns that the sponsored trip could create an appearance of potential improper influence.

The ethics commission informed DiNapoli that several commissioners raised concerns “the proposed reimbursement could give reasonable basis for the impression that a person could improperly influence you,” according to the letter, which was obtained through a public records request and shared exclusively with The Intercept.

DiNapoli has been an enthusiastic backer of investing New York pension and investment funds in Israel Bonds. Amid Israel’s genocide in Gaza, efforts by the movement to boycott, divest from, and sanction Israel have gained steam — including campaigns urging divestment from Israeli bonds. DiNapoli tilted in the opposite direction, including a $20 million New York pension fund investment in Israel bonds in the wake of the October 7 attacks.

According to an itinerary of the trip drafted by JCRC and obtained by the group Jewish Voice for Peace New York, DiNapoli was slated to meet with Israel Bonds staffers. In 2024, according to its website, JCRC received financial backing from Israel Bonds — which Jewish Voice for Peace organizers said could hint at a potential improper influence. The Israel Bonds donation was for a float in the 2024 Israel Day parade organized by the JCRC, a spokesperson for the group said. DiNapoli regularly attends the rally, including in 2024.

On Sunday, DiNapoli and other state and local electeds marched in the parade again, joined by an array of extremist Israeli political figures including Bezalel Smotrich, the current finance minister and a far-right champion of illegal settlements.

“By participating in trips organized and paid for by an organization that receives institutional donations and is closely and publicly aligned with Israel Bonds, while simultaneously promoting his office’s ongoing investments in Israel Bonds, Comptroller DiNapoli engaged in a foreign policy function far outside his statutory mandate as a fiduciary to millions of pensioners and public employees,” Lisa Mulleneaux, a researcher with JVP’s “Break the Bonds” campaign, wrote in an October complaint to the ethics commission.

“This represents a serious violation of his ethical obligation under §74(3)(f) to avoid any impression that his official duties can be swayed by outside groups,” Mulleneaux wrote. “At minimum, it undermines public trust in the independence of the Comptroller’s office and the integrity of the state’s investment decisions.”

In a statement to The Intercept, a spokesperson for DiNapoli pointed to the ethics commission’s ultimate approval of the JCRC reimbursement and said his office was unaware of any ethics complaint filed in relation to the trip. (The New York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government declined to comment.)

In his 18 years as comptroller — and particularly in the months and years following October 7 and the launch of Israel’s genocide in Gaza — DiNapoli has turned the state’s pension fund into one of the largest holders of Israel Bonds nationwide. Since the February 2024 trip, Dinapoli has invested $120 million of the state’s common retirement fund in the instruments, bringing the total investment of state pension funds in Israel Bonds to $332.5 million.

“Officials like Comptroller DiNapoli are responsible for the safeguarding of pension funds through strategic investing that prioritizes the needs of public sector workers and retirees,” said Dani Noble, an organizer with Jewish Voice for Peace. “Instead, Comptroller DiNapoli is investing the NY pension in Israel Bonds — unrestricted loans to the Israeli military and government used for every aspect of violence against Palestinians.”

Israel Bonds in Primary

DiNapoli’s fervent support for Israel Bonds have become a talking point in his primary race, with challengers Raj Goyle and Drew Warshaw both pledging to divest from investments in Israel should they take office.

Running from DiNapoli’s left, Goyle’s and Warshaw’s positions are in line with former New York City comptroller and current House candidate Brad Lander, who chose not to buy new Israel Bonds while overseeing the city’s pension fund.

For the most vocal critics, the moral argument against public investment in Israel Bonds is paramount. Becky Silber, a New York state employee and member of Jewish Voice for Peace told The Intercept that she was horrified to learn in 2024 that her hard-earned retirement funds were being used to send money to the state of Israel.

“When I became aware that my pension fund was being used to fund Israel, I was gutted.”

“When I became aware that my pension fund was being used to fund Israel, I was gutted, honestly,” Silber told The Intercept. “I was horrified watching the news coming out of Gaza. I was checking every purchase in the grocery store to make sure that my money wasn’t funding it. And so to learn that hundreds of millions of dollars of my pension fund were being sent to Israel with no guardrails on how it was spent, that was devastating.”

Critics of the investments also point to a fiscally responsible argument against the bonds. Unlike traditional foreign-debt assets, Israel Bonds cannot be sold on a secondary market and instead must be held until they mature. That makes them a potentially unsound bet, especially considering the rapid decline of Israel’s credit rating in recent years.

“It is hard to justify this as financial prudence or an effective strategy for diversification, especially when many other comparable investments are less risky; more transparent; and more liquid,” said Kaycee Wimbish, a Kingston, New York, resident active with the Mid-Hudson Valley chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America. “These utterly disproportionate investments reveal a hidden political agenda.”

Trump says troops turned back from Beirut after Netanyahu call

0
trump-says-troops-turned-back-from-beirut-after-netanyahu-call
Trump says troops turned back from Beirut after Netanyahu call

Shortly after reporting emerged Monday that Iran was suspending talks with the United States over Israel’s ramped up assault on Lebanon, President Donald Trump claimed that Israeli forces headed toward Beirut have “turned back” and that Hezbollah has agreed that “all shooting will stop” following separate phone calls with representatives from the two warring sides.

Since Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu began bombing Iran on February 28, Iranian officials and global experts have repeatedly accused the Israeli government of trying to sabotage any path to peace.

Iran’s Tasnim News Agency reported Monday that “given the continuation of the Israeli regime’s attacks in Lebanon, and considering that Lebanon had been one of the preconditions for a ceasefire – which has now been violated on all fronts, including Lebanon – the Iranian negotiating team is suspending ‘talks and exchanges of texts through mediators.’”

According to Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-affiliated news agency, the IRGC said in a statement that Iran considers “the crossing of red lines in Lebanon and Gaza to mean direct war and the imposition of costs on its national security and the Islamic Resistance,” and in response, it will “undertake defensive operations through unconventional measures, opening new fronts and maintaining the Strait of Hormuz equation.”

Iran has responded to the US-Israeli assault by restricting traffic through the waterway, a key trade route, particularly for fossil fuels and fertilizer. As oil prices around the world have soared, Trump has imposed a naval blockade that he has maintained despite the April ceasefire agreement—which Israel initially claimed did not include Lebanon.

In a brief phone call on Monday, Trump told NBC News that he had not been informed of Iran’s reported decision to suspend negotiations over Israel’s escalation in Lebanon, but “I think it’s fine if they’re done talking.”

“It’s an appropriate thing to say, because they’re better negotiators than they are fighters,” he continued. “But they haven’t informed us of that.” He added: “It doesn’t mean we’re going to go and start dropping bombs all over there.”

That comment notably came after the Trump administration launched new strikes against Iran over the weekend, and the Iranians attacked US military installations in the Middle East.

“We’ll keep the blockade,” Trump told NBC. “If they don’t want to talk, that’s OK with me. I think it’s fine. I don’t particularly want to talk either. We talk too much.”

However, shortly after that, Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he “had a very productive call” with Netanyahu, “and there will be no Troops going to Beirut, and any Troops that are on their way, have already been turned back.”

“Likewise, through highly placed Representatives, I had a very good call with Hezbollah, and they agreed that all shooting will stop — That Israel will not attack them, and they will not attack Israel,” Trump continued. Less than 15 minutes later, he added that “talks are continuing, at a rapid pace, with the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

While Iran’s leadership had not publicly confirmed that talks were halted on Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on social media that “the ceasefire between Iran and the US is unequivocally a ceasefire on all fronts, including in Lebanon. Its violation on one front is a violation of the ceasefire on all fronts. The US and Israel are responsible for the consequences of any violation.”

Iran’s chief negotiator, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, similarly said: “The naval blockade and escalation of war crimes in Lebanon by the genocidal Zionist regime are clear evidence of US noncompliance with the ceasefire. Every choice has a price, and the bill comes due. It will all fall into place.”

Responding to Israel “dramatically escalating its military campaign” in southern Lebanon and Tasnim’s reporting on negotiations, Sina Toossi, a senior nonresident fellow at the Center for International Policy in Washington, DC, concluded that “the Iranian message is increasingly clear: no Lebanon ceasefire, no broader framework, and potentially no talks at all.”

“The talks are in a vicious cycle: progress, escalation, backtracking,” he noted. “Many in Iran suspect Trump is trying to bring down the ‘floor’ for oil prices ahead of more war. And Israel is doing everything it can to derail diplomacy by turning southern Lebanon into another Gaza.”

The “Gaza playbook” Israel is now using in Lebanon, Toossi said, features “scorched-earth tactics, mass displacement, and the ethnic cleansing” of its neighboring nation.

Other experts also pointed to Gaza, where Israel is widely accused of pursuing a genocide against Palestinians in the besieged exclave. Calling out Reuters reporting on Israel’s escalation in Lebanon, Arab Center Washington DC fellow Assal Rad said that “like ‘targeting Hamas’ in Gaza, ‘Hezbollah-controlled’ is used to justify Israel flattening entire neighborhoods in Lebanon. This isn’t journalism, it’s stenography.”

“This is what Israel’s total destruction of southern Lebanon looks like, deliberately destroying people’s homes so they have nothing to return to,” she added, sharing satellite images of the destruction.

Mohamad Safa, who earlier this year resigned as a representative for the nongovernmental organization Patriotic Vision Association at the United Nations, on Monday accused Israel of “committing another genocide in real time in Lebanon with complete impunity.”

Former US Department of Defense adviser Jasmine El-Gamal, who now leads the consulting firm Averos Strategies, said early Monday: “Early in the Iran war, I warned that US and Israeli interests would inevitably diverge and that President Trump would have to make a choice: to actually put America first, or to continue to allow Netanyahu to threaten our interests. Lebanon is the epitome of this choice.”

-Common Dreams

AI costs how much? GitHub Copilot users react to new usage-based pricing system.

0
ai-costs-how-much?-github-copilot-users-react-to-new-usage-based-pricing-system.
AI costs how much? GitHub Copilot users react to new usage-based pricing system.

In April, GitHub announced that it was moving subscribers from request-based billing to a usage-based model for its AI-powered Copilot service. As that new pricing model goes into effect today, many GitHub Copilot users are reporting some extreme sticker shock as they realize just how quickly their previous “normal” usage is burning through their newly limited monthly allotment of AI credits.

Across social media and forums, many Copilot users are sharing personal statistics showing how just a few hours of AI usage can now account for a large chunk of their new monthly subscription caps. For some users, it reportedly took less than a day to use up a month’s usage quota.

That’s a big change from previous months, when GitHub Copilot subscribers were allocated a certain number of “requests” and “premium requests” based on their payment tier. GitHub said that the old system meant that “a quick chat question and a multi-hour autonomous coding session [could] cost the user the same amount,” forcing Copilot itself to “absorb much of the escalating inference cost behind that usage.” Indeed, some Copilot users have been sharing estimates from GitHub’s own tool showing that their previous monthly usage would rack up bills in the thousands of dollars under the new pricing plan.

Cost estimates like this show just how much GitHub was subsidizing power users’ Copilot habit in the past months.

Cost estimates like this show just how much GitHub was subsidizing power users’ Copilot habit in the past months. Credit: twhoff / Reddit

Under GitHub’s new usage-based pricing system, paid Copilot subscriptions instead grant users a certain number of AI “credits” each month, with one credit corresponding to $0.01 of usage. Subscribers also get bonus credits depending on their subscription level: the $10/month Pro plan includes 1,500 credits ($15 worth); the $39 Pro+ plan includes 7,000 credits ($70 worth); and the $100/month Copilot Max plan includes 20,000 credits ($200 worth).

The precise number of Copilot credits used by a given prompt is determined by the number of input and output tokens used and the rates charged by the underlying large language model. That means pricing is highly dependent not just on the type of request but on the specific model that a user chooses. One million output tokens from OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 nano would run just $1.25 on GitHub Copilot, but that same level of output would run $30 on the frontier GPT-5.5 model (Copilot users who rely on “Auto” mode to pick the most appropriate available model for any request should be extremely careful, as some users report it can switch to expensive models for extremely simple queries).

How much for that prompt in the window?

Spot testing by Ars Technica found that re-running our simple “build a Minesweeper game” prompt through Claude Haiku 4.5 via Copilot used about 94 credits (you can view the results here). That’s a pretty decent rate for a relatively simple toy project. But it’s also easy to see how those kinds of costs could balloon quickly for requests involving major changes or reviews on complex codebases.

You can see that kind of ballooning cost in reports of a single complex prompt burning through 171 Copilot credits, or another spending 700 credits on “a few prompts,” or a couple of Copilot-led commits using up 5,000 credits. Other Copilot users expressed surprise at just how many credits could be spent on even simple Copilot requests, from a reported 15 credits for a simple “run-of-the-mill query” to spending 100 credits in “generating a small plan.”

“Even though I was super cautious on the first day, trying it out with a limited number of uses, it still consumed 840 credits,” one user wrote of testing Claude Sonnet 4.6 through Copilot today. “I haven’t even done any really complex work yet,” another user complained after reported usage representing 21 percent of their monthly Pro Copilot subscription’s credit allotment in a single day. “I have a feeling I’ll be going somewhere else pretty soon.”

Using all 8,000 of your org’s monthly AI credits in a single day is… probably not sustainable.

Using all 8,000 of your org’s monthly AI credits in a single day is… probably not sustainable. Credit: gxjo / X

Amid the pricing change, plenty of GitHub Copilot users are predictably and publicly threatening to cancel their subscriptions or looking for other AI coding options. But others say they have been able to adjust to the new world of usage-based pricing. Coder Henri Kinnunen writes that they only burned 161 credits in a “productive day” of using Claude 5.3-Codex through Copilot, thanks to limiting themselves to “very focused and deliberate changes with AI.” Over on Bluesky, coder Neil Hewitt wisely noted that continuing a three-day-old chat session on Copilot probably isn’t as wise now, since it means sending “the entire chat history as context every time… hey, input tokens use credits… it’s not rocket science.”

While some Copilot users are jumping ship for other services with more generous usage limits, that kind of subsidized customer acquisition may soon give way to Copilot-style usage-based pricing across the industry. If that happens, LLMs that are more efficient with their tokens may win the economic battle; on Reddit, one user is already discussing how they’ve integrated Deepseek into their GitHub VSCode environment at a cost of only “about 7 cents for 15 million tokens.” While you might say “you get what you pay for,” some AI users are now contemplating a world where they also have to pay for what they get.

Shipping Leaders Demand Clear Rules Before Returning to Strait of Hormuz

0
shipping-leaders-demand-clear-rules-before-returning-to-strait-of-hormuz
Shipping Leaders Demand Clear Rules Before Returning to Strait of Hormuz


Shipping executives gathering in Athens on Monday warned that any future peace agreement between the United States and Iran must include clear, enforceable rules to allow commercial vessels to safely resume operations through the Strait of Hormuz.

The comments came as shipowners and maritime officials met at the Capital Link conference and other events marking the start of Posidonia, the biennial week‑long shipping exhibition. Industry leaders said uncertainty in the Gulf continues to disrupt global trade and place heavy strain on crews.

Pankaj Khanna, president of Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp, said the sector urgently needs a defined framework outlining how ships can enter and exit the region once a peace deal is reached. He noted that one of the company’s vessels has been stuck inside the Gulf for three months, with seafarers missing major family events.

Greece’s shipping minister, Vasilis Kikilias, said no one can predict when the conflict will end, stressing how quickly tensions escalate and how slowly they are resolved. He insisted that global shipping must not be denied free passage, even though recent events show that keeping maritime trade out of geopolitical disputes is increasingly difficult.

Yiannis Procopiou, CEO of Centrofin Management, said that while insurance may still be available, the Strait of Hormuz remains a high‑risk transit point without clear rules of engagement for dealing with both the U.S. and Iran. Until such guidelines exist, he argued, the area will remain an unattractive and dangerous route for commercial shipping.

Battleground Vienna: Austrian intelligence officer convicted of spying for Russia belongs to a long tradition

0

Egisto Ott is no James Bond. But the stories the 63-year-old Austrian told a Viennese jury recently would make good plotlines. Ott worked as an intelligence officer in Austria’s now-defunct Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Counterterrorism. He was also moonlighting for the Russians.

Prosecutors say Ott, who was sentenced to four years in prison on May 20, handed over information to fellow Austrian Jan Marsalek, the fugitive former executive of the collapsed payments firm Wirecard. Marsalek ran a cell of Bulgarians who were convicted in London in 2025 of spying for Russia. They called themselves the “minions”.

In 2023, the London Metropolitan police in cooperation with MI5 secured chat messages between Marsalek and the minions, which led to Ott. It turned out Ott had provided sensitive data on dissidents, investigative journalists and a Russian intelligence defector. The trial also revealed that Ott had obtained the infamous “canoe-trip-mobiles”.

In 2017, high-ranking Austrian civil servants went on a canoe trip in a tributary of the Danube River. They managed to fall into the water and had their phones sent in for repairs. Their mobile data was copied by Ott and subsequently ended up in Moscow, along with Marsalek’s favourite Viennese chocolate cake, a Sachertorte. According to the chat messages, the minions had a stressful time finding the correct one (there are rival Sachertorte recipes).

Egisto Ott in a courtroom in Vienna.

Egisto Ott in a courtroom in Vienna on May 20. APA-Images / Alamy

What sounds like a comic opera has a sinister backstory. Since the 1950s, Austria has hosted several international organisations that are regularly targeted by intelligence services. These include Opec (the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries), the International Atomic Energy Agency and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

However, Austria’s reputation as a spying hub dates back even longer. The Austrian capital, Vienna, was known for espionage before and after the second world war. Arnold Deutsch, the recruiter of the Cambridge Five spy ring that passed information to the Soviet Union, hailed from Vienna. Its leading light, Kim Philby, was also talent-spotted by Soviet intelligence in the city in 1933.

But Vienna was never just a playground for Soviet intelligence. After the war, when the city was divided into four sectors for allied occupation, the UK’s foreign intelligence service, MI6, started its most creative cold war operations. Peter Lunn, head of MI6’s Vienna station, built listening stations in the city to tap Soviet phone lines.

He hid his listening tunnels underneath ordinary shops in the British zone. The first tunnel was built beneath a police station. Later, MI6 built another tunnel under a jewellery shop and then installed intelligence officers posing as a young, rich couple in a Viennese villa. While they were partying upstairs, their colleagues listened in to Russian military traffic downstairs.

The only surviving witness of a listening station today is Sir Rodric Braithwaite, whom I first interviewed in 2024. As a 19-year-old conscript, Braithwaite worked with British Army Field Security in the Aspang listening station, next to the Aspang Bahnhof (a train station on the outskirts of Vienna).

It wasn’t an uplifting experience. He sat there for long shifts with earphones on, handling old equipment and pressing recording buttons. But his memories of the tunnel are valuable because to this day MI6 has not released any photos, let alone recordings, that were made during these operations.

The Third Man

They have also not revealed the details of another highly creative intelligence operation. In 1948, a British team arrived in Vienna to film The Third Man, a thriller set in the city. They were eager to shoot scenes in the Soviet sector.

Four key people involved in the making of the film were working for British intelligence: novelist Graham Greene, director Carol Reed, “Austria advisor” Elizabeth Montagu and, most importantly, producer Sir Alexander Korda. Korda’s film production company had been providing covers for British intelligence officers in Europe since the 1930s.

Whether the filming of The Third Man was connected to Lunn’s tapping operations, or whether MI6 had to smuggle something out of the Soviet sector, is a matter of conjecture. But “odd people” appeared on the set.

Carol Reed in Amsterdam in January 1950.

The director of The Third Man, Carol Reed, in Amsterdam in January 1950. Jack de Nijs / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY

The film’s sound engineer, Jack Davies, remembered a British technician who turned up out of the blue. After filming, the technician vanished completely and Davies never came across him again – something rather unusual in the small world of British film technicians.

The script girl, Angela Allen, who I first interviewed for my book Das Haus am Gordon Place (Vienna ‘48) in 2024, also realised that something odd was going on. She noticed that Carol Reed was under enormous stress in Vienna and kept himself awake with Benzedrine. He stopped taking the drug once they were back in England, filming in London studios.

Allen, who is 97 now, wasn’t surprised to find out years later that Korda was working for the British intelligence services. She told me: “He had enormous charm. He could make his people do everything for him.”

Perhaps that is one reason why Ott and Marsalek failed. To succeed as a spy in Vienna, you need to be a great illusionist like Alexander Korda.

In Iran war’s shadow, Israel’s renewed Lebanon campaign risks repeating failed lessons – and occupations – of the past

0
in-iran-war’s-shadow,-israel’s-renewed-lebanon-campaign-risks-repeating-failed-lessons-–-and-occupations-–-of-the-past
In Iran war’s shadow, Israel’s renewed Lebanon campaign risks repeating failed lessons – and occupations – of the past

Going into the war in Iran, the Israeli government seemingly had two intertwined goals: to bring down the Islamic Republic and rid Israel of its Hezbollah problem.

The logic went that the Lebanese Shiite group – which has posed a persistent threat to Israel for 44 years – would finally succumb if stripped of its Iranian benefactor. After all, Israeli attempts to destroy Hezbollah through direct military action had not been effective, nor had internationally supported disarmament efforts.

But as the United States and Iran continue to negotiate over an agreement that might put an end to their war, the Israeli-Lebanese front remains as active as ever. Israel has increased strikes and incursions deeper into Lebanon, while Hezbollah is targeting the Israeli military deployed in southern Lebanon and the civilian population in northern Israel.

Worse, from the Israeli government’s perspective, is that Iran has found a way of turning its survival and newfound leverage over the Strait of Hormuz into protecting Hezbollah. Tehran is currently conditioning a potential deal with Washington on a complete halt of Israeli hostilities in Lebanon – a move clearly designed to safeguard the political and military standing of Hezbollah, its primary proxy.

Since full-scale war returned to Lebanon on March 2, 2026, it has had a massive humanitarian cost. As of June 1, over a million Lebanese have been displaced and more than 3,300 killed since the beginning of March. On the Israeli side, 24 soldiers and 4 civilians have been killed in the same time period.

Israel seeks to decouple its Lebanon front from the wider regional conflict, aiming to maintain its military campaign against the Shiite organization independently of broader U.S. negotiations with Iran. But whether it will able to do this is uncertain. The Trump administration has largely excluded Israel from the specifics of its Iranian dialogue while attempting to restrict Israeli operations in Lebanon to strikes in the country’s south and the Bekaa Valley and prohibiting attacks on state infrastructure. The ordering of attacks on Lebanon’s capital, Beirut, by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on June 1 lays bare the limits to U.S. pressure.

And ultimately, the resolution of this conflict rests upon how President Donald Trump chooses to navigate Iranian demands concerning the future of Lebanon.

As a historian of Israel and Lebanon, I have studied cycles of violence between these parties since 1982, and have noted recurring patterns in which Hezbollah has emerged emboldened, maintaining its dominance over Lebanese society as an Iranian proxy. Contrary to Israeli hopes, Iran’s patronage of Hezbollah has not been ended by the Iran war. And to confound issues, continued Israeli occupation of Lebanese land could grant Hezbollah the necessary justification to sustain its narrative of resistance at the cost of the broader Lebanese population.

A wounded but not dead Hezbollah

While significantly weakened as a result of more than two and a half years of war with Israel, Hezbollah continues to wield considerable power in Lebanon.

After a ceasefire in November 2024 – following the full-scale war in September-October of that year – ostensibly stopped fighting, a new Lebanese president was elected and a new government was established in February 2025.

A tank operates in a hilly environment.

An Israeli military tank drives along the Israeli-Lebanese border. Gil Cohen-Magen/Picture Alliance via Getty Images

That ended a three-year political deadlock generated by Hezbollah’s effective veto power over successive Lebanese governments since 2008. Even since the formation of a government in 2025, however, the Lebanese state has been unable to effectively make progress in disarming Hezbollah as stipulated in the November 2024, armistice agreement that ended that previous round of fighting.

Instead, Iran invested significant efforts to prop up its Lebanese proxy. Tehran even sent senior officers of its Revolutionary Guard soon after the November 2024 ceasefire to assume the command of the Shiite organization, which lost many of its leaders at the hands of Israeli assassinations and targeted strikes.

These efforts are paying off for Tehran now, as seen through Hezbollah’s ability to challenge Israel militarily.

With the beginning of this most recent war in March, the Lebanese prime minister banned Hezbollah’s operations, while the president condemned the group for dragging Lebanon into a conflict that most Lebanese rejected.

But, as in the past, the government has been unable to effectively rein in Hezbollah. A telling case came on March 24, 2026, when Lebanon’s Foreign Ministry declared the Iranian ambassador a persona non grata, ordering him to leave the country.

Iran and Hezbollah defied the order and the ambassador refused to leave the embassy in Beirut.

This example also suggests that the hopes for revitalized state capacities after the current Lebanese government came to power in February 2025 – the first government since 2008 not controlled by Hezbollah – may have been premature.

Gaza via Lebanon

Employing what some have called a “Gaza model” in Lebanon, Israel has effectively created a new security zone in south Lebanon by occupying Lebanese territory, razing to the ground whole villages that Hezbollah had used for military purposes and clearing out most of the population from the area.

But Israel has occupied south Lebanon in the past: first in March 1978, during the Litani operation, and then again from 1982 to 2000. The failure of these occupations should raise alarms in Israel. Neither resulted in lasting security improvements and instead left indelible, traumatic scars on Israel’s collective consciousness, creating the image of Lebanon as a quagmire into which Israel has been repeatedly drawn.

The government of Netanyahu is now leading the country into another potential quagmire in Lebanon.

The news about the Israel Defense Forces’ occupation of the Beaufort castle in south Lebanon on May 31 should bring grim memories for Israelis. That castle remains entrenched in the collective memory of Israel’s occupation of south Lebanon in 1982-2000 as a symbol of its failure. Netanyahu, however, packaged Israel’s occupation as a sign of strength, stating that “we have returned stronger than ever.” History suggests otherwise.

An old castle fortification stands atop a hill.

An Israeli flag flies over the medieval Beaufort castle on May 31, 2026. AFP/Getty Images

History repeats itself

Netanyahu is driven in large part by Israeli domestic affairs.

A majority of Israelis support the continuation of the war against Hezbollah. Moreover, with national elections scheduled for October 2026, Netanyahu needs to show some success in at least one of the multiple military fronts he has intentionally kept open since the Hamas attack on Oct. 7, 2023.

With Netanyahu seemingly failing to achieve his aims in Iran, Lebanon and Hezbollah provide him with an opportunity to keep a state of emergency in Israel, which he needs for his own political survival.

But failure in Iran makes achieving Netanyahu’s goal in Lebanon that much harder. The government in Tehran seems to have found significant leverage over the U.S. and Israel. And under these conditions, Tehran would not give up on Hezbollah, which remains its most important regional asset.

Diplomacy is the only way out of this imbroglio. And while it would not likely lead to the disarming of Hezbollah and to the Israel’s full withdrawal from south Lebanon, it remains the only constructive way forward.

At the behest of the Trump administration, Israeli and Lebanese ambassadors met to discuss a diplomatic understanding between two countries that have never had official relations. And on May 30, military representatives of the two countries met in Washington, D.C.

For the first time since 1983, the Lebanese government has agreed to negotiate directly with Israel over a long-term political agreement, including the possibility of finally demarcating their shared borders. Hezbollah, as expected, has vehemently opposed these negotiations.

What we are seeing currently unfolding in Lebanon is another testament to the failure of the Israeli-U.S. war against Iran. Yet a war that began with lofty promises of a new Middle East may end up with a worse version of the old Middle East – an emboldened Islamic Republic, a new Israeli occupation of south Lebanon and a Hezbollah, while weaker than before, still entrenched as an armed militia outside of Lebanese state control and working in concert with Iran.

Microsoft’s Surface Laptop Ultra looks like its first true MacBook Pro competitor

0
microsoft’s-surface-laptop-ultra-looks-like-its-first-true-macbook-pro-competitor
Microsoft’s Surface Laptop Ultra looks like its first true MacBook Pro competitor

Dell, Asus, Lenovo, HP, MSI, Acer, and Gigabyte are among the PC makers that are designing systems around Nvidia’s RTX Spark, Nvidia’s new Arm-based chip for Windows PCs. But the flagship RTX Spark PC may be from the same company that makes Windows: the new Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra is a high-end RTX Spark system that will offer up to 128GB of unified memory for “creators, developers, and AI builders.”

Microsoft says the Laptop Ultra will be available “later this year” but didn’t discuss any specific pricing or configuration options.

The Laptop Ultra will slot in above the regular Qualcomm Snapdragon-based Surface Laptops in Microsoft’s lineup. Microsoft has made high-end Surface devices with more powerful CPUs and GPUs before, but to date, they’ve also come with convertible designs that may have limited their appeal. The first was the old Surface Book, with its fully detachable screen and bendy-straw hinge that didn’t close all the way; the second was the Surface Laptop Studio, with its chunky design and sliding screen. The Laptop Ultra is Microsoft’s first attempt to follow the MacBook Pro formula: it’s like the other Surface Laptops, just with more power.

Microsoft says the Laptop Ultra will include USB-A, USB-C, and HDMI ports, as well as an SD card slot and headphone jack. It’s said to include a haptic trackpad that’s “the largest we’ve ever put on a Surface.” A 15-inch PixelSense display offers up to 2,000 nits of peak brightness.

Unlike some older Surface Laptops, the Laptop Ultra is just a more powerful laptop, not a more powerful one that also comes with some weird convertible mechanism.

Unlike some older Surface Laptops, the Laptop Ultra is just a more powerful laptop, not a more powerful one that also comes with some weird convertible mechanism. Credit: Microsoft

As for the internal specs, Nvidia’s RTX Spark includes up to 20 Arm CPU cores (10 large high-performance cores, and 10 mid-sized cores with better efficiency) and up to 6,144 Blackwell-based GPU cores. This gives the high-end RTX Spark roughly the same computing resources as a desktop GeForce RTX 5070, though in a lower 80 W power envelope and attached to slower LPDDR5x RAM rather than GDDR7.

But the chip’s biggest advantage for AI developers and some gamers may be the system’s pool of unified memory. A typical RTX 5070 can access only 8GB or 12GB of memory; the RTX Spark’s built-in GPU will likely be able to access nearly all of the system’s built-in memory. Even a laptop with 32GB of RAM could devote more of that memory to the GPU than a GeForce RTX 4090 or 5090 could.

Gaming is still a relatively weak point for the Arm version of Windows, but Nvidia and Microsoft have said that they’re working with the developers of popular online games that rely on kernel-level anti-cheat software to make those titles run on Arm systems. Microsoft’s Prism x86-to-Arm code translation technology and an increasing number of Arm-native third-party apps have made Arm-powered Windows PCs feel a lot more like regular Windows devices than they used to.

Microsoft has used Nvidia’s chips in Surface PCs before, if you count the first Surface RT models. These ran an Arm-native version of Windows 8 that was limited mostly to apps downloaded from the Microsoft Store and offered no x86-to-Arm code translation. While the work done on Windows RT was no doubt the foundation that the Arm versions of Windows 10 and Windows 11 were built on, Windows RT quickly failed and vanished, along with Nvidia Tegra-based PCs.

Fans Smash Through Glass Doors at Mall Event for TV Star (Video)

0
fans-smash-through-glass-doors-at-mall-event-for-tv-star-(video)
Fans Smash Through Glass Doors at Mall Event for TV Star (Video)


Chinese actor Zhang Linghe was forced to scrap a major brand appearance on Sunday after a massive crowd of fans turned a shopping center event into chaos.

The 27-year-old actor and model was scheduled to appear at a Molsion eyewear event in Nanning, a city in southern China, when thousands of excited fans packed the venue hoping to catch a glimpse of the television heartthrob.

But the situation quickly spiraled out of control.

According to reports and videos shared on social media, fans surged toward the entrance as the doors opened. The force of the crowd was so intense that the glass entrance doors shattered, leaving five people injured.

Footage from inside the mall also showed fans crowding balconies and upper levels of the shopping center, with many trying to get a better view of the star.

The brand event was eventually canceled for safety reasons and moved online instead.

Zhang’s studio later said it would reimburse fans who had traveled to attend the appearance. Molsion also said it had arranged medical checks for those who suffered minor injuries and promised to strengthen safety measures at future events.

The frightening scene shows just how intense Zhang’s fanbase has become as his star continues to rise far beyond China.

Zhang Linghe has become one of Chinese television’s biggest breakout names in recent years. He has appeared in several hit dramas, including Love Between Fairy and Devil, The Princess Royal, and Pursuit of Jade, all of which helped boost his popularity with international viewers on Netflix.

What was supposed to be a glamorous eyewear promotion instead became a startling reminder of the frenzy that can follow today’s biggest streaming-era stars.

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
- Advertisement -
Google search engine

Recent Posts