Prince Harry’s long-running fight over privacy and security took an unsettling turn this week after an alleged stalker was reportedly able to sit just rows behind him during a high-profile court hearing in London.
The Duke of Sussex was attending proceedings at the Royal Courts of Justice as part of his legal case against Associated Newspapers when concerns surfaced over how easily a fixated fan may have gained access to the same courtroom.
According to reporting in the Telegraph, the woman — who has previously been flagged by police as a “fixated individual” — managed to enter Court 76 twice while Harry was present, at one point sitting only a few feet behind him as his legal team argued the case.
The moment was particularly alarming given Harry’s ongoing battle with the British government over security protection in the U.K., a fight he has repeatedly framed as a matter of personal safety for himself, Meghan Markle, and their children.
The woman has long portrayed herself not as a threat, but as a devoted supporter and member of the so-called “Sussex Squad.” She first appeared on Harry and Meghan’s radar during their May 2024 trip to Nigeria, where she managed to get physically close to the couple. At the time, there was no indication she was considered dangerous.
That changed months later. By September, she had reportedly been added to a police watch list of fixated individuals following a string of increasingly concerning encounters.
At one London event connected to Harry’s charity work with WellChild, the woman is said to have entered the venue hours early and hidden in a bathroom, emerging only when she believed Harry was nearby. At another charity engagement supporting injured service members, Harry’s security team allegedly had to physically block her from approaching him, hustling the prince inside moments later.
Those incidents have since been cited by Harry’s legal team as evidence that his current security arrangements leave him vulnerable.
What startled observers this week was just how little stood between Harry and a potentially dangerous individual inside one of Britain’s most important legal buildings. Security at the Royal Courts of Justice is notably light. Bags are scanned, visitors walk through metal detectors, and members of the public are routinely allowed into courtrooms with minimal oversight.
Even journalists present noted how easy it would be for someone with malicious intent to bring prohibited items inside. One reporter admitted a metal camera tripod — capable of being used as a weapon — passed through security unnoticed earlier in the day before being flagged hours later.
During the hearing, Harry relied solely on private security, who have no authority to remove members of the public from courtrooms. There were no visible armed police officers assigned to him — a sharp contrast to other senior royals who retain state-mandated protection.
Supporters of Harry argue the incident perfectly illustrates why he should receive full, automatic police protection whenever he visits the U.K., rather than relying on a “bespoke” arrangement that reportedly amounts to little more than a liaison phone number.
Critics, however, point out that the presence of an overzealous fan in an open courtroom is unlikely to sway the committees currently deciding whether Harry’s security should be reinstated. Courts are public spaces, and similar situations have occurred with other high-profile figures.
Still, the optics are troubling. It’s difficult to imagine a fixated individual being allowed to sit yards behind someone like Prince Andrew, who continues to receive police protection.
Beyond the immediate safety concerns, the episode highlights just how exposed Harry remains under the current system — and why the issue remains deeply personal for him. He has repeatedly cited the death of his mother, Princess Diana, as a defining factor in his fear of history repeating itself.
Whether or not the British government ultimately restores Harry’s security, the fact that an alleged stalker was able to sit just feet away from the king’s son in a crowded courtroom has reignited the debate — and raised uncomfortable questions about how seriously those risks are being taken.
function pinIt() { var e = document.createElement(‘script’); e.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’); e.setAttribute(‘charset’,’UTF-8′); e.setAttribute(‘src’,’https://assets.pinterest.com/js/pinmarklet.js?r=’+Math.random()*99999999); document.body.appendChild(e); }
