16.2 C
London
Friday, October 9, 2026
Home Blog

Islamic Jihad says Palestinian factions agree in Cairo to postpone elections

0
islamic-jihad-says-palestinian-factions-agree-in-cairo-to-postpone-elections
Islamic Jihad says Palestinian factions agree in Cairo to postpone elections

Palestinian factions participating in talks in Cairo have reached a consensus to postpone the scheduled Palestinian elections, with an official announcement expected in the coming period, according to Islamic Jihad.

Mohammed al-Hindi, the movement’s deputy secretary-general, said the meetings hosted by Egypt had resulted in an agreement among Palestinian factions to delay the elections as part of broader understandings aimed at addressing national issues and continuing internal dialogue.

Al-Hindi said the Fatah delegation would return to Ramallah to follow up on the understandings reached during the meetings.

He added that a new election date would be determined through consensus among the various Palestinian factions.

According to al-Hindi, participants also agreed to continue national dialogue in the coming period to strengthen Palestinian consensus and address outstanding political issues.

OPINION: The Palestinian election dilemma

Driver wins $76 after ALPR led to bogus traffic stop, drug searches

0
driver-wins-$76-after-alpr-led-to-bogus-traffic-stop,-drug-searches
Driver wins $76 after ALPR led to bogus traffic stop, drug searches

A federal jury in Texas recently ruled in favor of a man who sued Bexar County and its sheriff over allegations that the agency ran what the plaintiff’s attorneys called an “unconstitutional traffic stop scheme” enabled by “AI-powered” license plate readers.

Late last month, plaintiff Alek Schott of Houston was awarded $76, one dollar for each minute that he was detained. (Schott asked for this exact amount as symbolic compensation.)

“After the stop, I filed a complaint with the Sheriff’s Office because I knew what happened to me was wrong,” Schott said in a statement after his win. “The department reviewed it, told me they didn’t see any violation, and said if I had a problem with it, I should sue them. So I did.”

Suspicion

In his civil complaint, Schott outlined a wild tale.

Schott had been driving his pickup truck home from a work trip to Carrizo Springs, in the southwestern part of the state, in March 2022. While in Bexar County, which covers the area around San Antonio, a police officer pulled Schott over for “lane drifting.”

The father of two was questioned by deputy Joel Babb, who admitted later that the stated reason for the traffic stop was bogus.

The real reason for the stop was that Babb had received a tip via a law enforcement WhatsApp group. It came from someone named “Kiki,” who allegedly worked with a federal fusion center in Laredo. Kiki apparently had near real-time access to automated license plate reader data.

According to Babb’s deposition, Kiki told him that Schott’s truck had made a potentially suspicious “one-day turnaround.” That is, Schott drove all the way from Houston, stopped in Carrizo Springs for one night, and then returned home to Houston the next day. (Schott sells oilfield supplies.) To authorities, this was apparently enough to make one look like a smuggling suspect.

After seeing the WhatsApp message, Babb waited for Schott’s vehicle and pulled it over once it passed his location. During the traffic stop, Babb said that he was on the “Criminal Interdiction Unit” looking for “human smuggling, drug smuggling, and all those things like that.”

According to the Institute for Justice, which helped Schott with his lawsuit, the entire stop was a travesty. “Footage from Alek’s own dashcam shows he never drifted lanes,” the group said. “Bodycam footage from the deputy shows Alek gave the officer calm, mundane answers about a run-of-the-mill work trip. Nothing about what he said was suspicious, but the deputy called a drug dog anyway. And moments before the dog alerted by jumping on the truck, the handler’s bodycam shows that he signaled the dog.”

Schott was detained for 76 minutes while his truck was thoroughly searched. Cops found nothing, despite the drug dog’s alert.

Schott eventually sued Bexar County. In late September, he won—the jury gave him the token $76 he requested.

“Money was never what mattered,” his lawyers said. “This was and has always been about the Constitution. IJ will now ask the court to enjoin Bexar County from using baseless traffic stops as a tool for warrantless searches, and will work to enforce the precedent across the state.”

“This is what mass surveillance looks like when it reaches the shoulder of the highway,” Josh Windham, one of Schott’s attorneys, said in a statement. “An AI-powered camera flagged Alek’s plate. An anonymous law enforcement agent decided his completely ordinary trip looked suspicious. And a deputy went out and found a violation that never happened.”

The Bexar County Sheriff’s Office, which touts its use of Flock Safety cameras, declined Ars’ request for comment.

Who watches the watchers?

Longtime critics of license plate readers generally, and Flock in particular, told Ars that scrutiny of this technology is increasing.

“I think this case seems like a pretty quintessential example of what we’re seeing more and more as the public digs into ALPR surveillance: AI tech that vendors sell with pie-in-the-sky promises to improve public safety often face a tough reality check,” Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Center of Democracy and Technology’s Security and Surveillance Project, wrote in an email to Ars.

“The truth is that ALPRs create serious dangers for Americans’ civil liberties, and if there aren’t sensible guardrails and checks on how these powerful tools are used, they also create serious risks to public safety with drivers being improperly pulled over or stalked by officers abusing the tech.”

Belt and Road paving way for China’s military presence in SE Asia

0
belt-and-road-paving-way-for-china’s-military-presence-in-se-asia
Belt and Road paving way for China’s military presence in SE Asia

Last week, eight Chinese-made light attack jets sat on a half-finished runway at Ban Keun, flanked by more than two dozen military support vehicles, offering the first aerial glimpse of a new Chinese-Lao military facility north of the Lao capital, Vientiane.

The speed of the buildup and the earthmoving visible around the airstrip in the satellite imagery suggest China may have acquired its first full-fledged military base in Southeast Asia. If so, over a decade of Chinese infrastructure lending likely left Laos too indebted and too dependent to refuse the outpost.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which Chinese President Xi Jinping unveiled in Kazakhstan in 2013, has certainly not delivered the economic windfall it promised for Laos, not least from a US$6 billion high-speed rail line connecting the two neighbors that has likely done more for Chinese migration into Laos than mutually beneficial two-way trade.

Rather, the train and other Belt and Road projects have given Beijing something else: leverage. Across Southeast Asia, China has turned economic ties into political and now military power, most overtly in Myanmar and Cambodia but now also in Laos, an impoverished neighbor of just eight million people that is firmly in Beijing’s economic orbit.

China’s Ministry of National Defense said in a September 30 statement that the China-Laos Joint Support and Training Center and a China-Laos Friendship Aviation Academy “officially went into operation on September 29, 2026.”

The Chinese statement said Lao Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Khamlieng Outhakaysone attended the inauguration ceremony, along with a delegation from China’s People’s Liberation Army.

The Chinese ministry said the two sides would jointly maintain and operate the center, which it described as “aimed at helping Laos strengthen the training of its air force pilots.” The statement asserted it is “not directed against any third party” and “contributes to enhancing practical military cooperation as well as promoting regional peace and stability.”

It’s not clear, however, that neighboring Thailand or Vietnam will view the facility the same way. Located about 50 kilometers north of the Lao capital, Ban Keun was an airfield used by the Americans during the Vietnam War era, known as “Lima Site 44.”

Air America, a secretive airline controlled by the US Central Intelligence Agency, used Ban Keun to carry US-backed ethnic minority Hmong fighters from highland areas as well as supplies into remote mountain airstrips, Reuters reported.

Analysts say the new Chinese-funded facility there may not stay modest for long. Alexander Neill, an adjunct fellow at the Pacific Forum in Hawaii, told Reuters the airfield appears engineered to allow a runway extension that “could in future serve larger aircraft, including signals intelligence and electronic-surveillance planes to extend China’s reach into Southeast Asia.”

Diplomats and analysts, meanwhile, will be watching for the introduction of air defenses, fuel and ammunition storage, and surveillance installations, any of which would suggest the base is meant for much more than training.

Laos may have little to no choice but to accommodate China’s commands on the base and potentially others down the line. Chinese state-owned and private companies have financed, built and operate many of Laos’ large hydropower dams, which contribute largely to the small nation’s big power export ambitions.

Upstream, Chinese dams on the Mekong River have altered water flows into Laos and downstream into Thailand and Cambodia. Chinese firms also hold extensive Lao mining concessions, tapping into rich reserves of copper, gold and some rare earth metals. And Chinese capital has turned large stretches of the country into rubber, banana and timber plantations that serve mainly the Chinese market.

The United States and its Western allies have done little to counter China’s spreading influence in Laos beyond working through the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), hoping the bloc can counter Beijing’s pull on Vientiane. ASEAN, however, operates on the twin cardinal principles of “non-interference” and “consensus”, meaning it is ill-suited to any geopolitical rebalancing task.

Cambodia is another version of the same Belt and Road Initiative playbook. China is Cambodia’s largest investor and closest political partner, and years of Belt and Road financing for ports, roads, power plants and special economic zones have deepened Phnom Penh’s economic reliance on Beijing. That dependence has had a military payoff, most visibly at the Ream Naval Base on the Gulf of Thailand.

Fears over China’s presence at Ream first surfaced in 2019, when The Wall Street Journal reported that US officials had seen a draft agreement giving China 30-year use of the base, including the right to post personnel, store weapons and berth warships. Phnom Penh predictably denied it, noting that its constitution forbids foreign bases.

But China began helping to fund a revamp of the facility in 2022, soon after the demolition of a US-funded building on the site in 2020 amid a downturn in bilateral ties on democracy issues and suspended joint military exercises. Chinese warships have since docked there for months at a time.

Ream’s renovation was completed in 2025 with a new pier able to take much larger ships and a dry dock for repairs. Prime Minister Hun Manet inaugurated the base on April 5 of that year, with a delegation from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) on hand, and said Cambodia had “nothing to hide.”

Within days, China and Cambodia held joint exercises at a China-Cambodia Joint Support and Training Center there. That name is strikingly similar to the one given to the new facility at Ban Keun in Laos, suggesting a Beijing-scripted template: a “joint” training and support center that gives China cover for and a permanent military foothold.

Cambodia insists Ream is open to all friendly nations, and in January 2026 the USS Cincinnati became the first US warship to dock at the upgraded base. But strategic analysts remain skeptical. Having paid for the expansion, they argue, China will continue to enjoy preferential access whatever the constitution says, and Phnom Penh’s hedging looks more like a way to blunt Western criticism than real rebalancing.

The pattern is by now familiar: Beijing finances infrastructure in a Southeast Asian country, the host government denies any quid pro quo and a military presence quietly emerges in the name of joint training.

Myanmar is another ASEAN country where China has made considerable inroads. Beijing’s security planners have long seen Myanmar as a link between China and South and Southeast Asia, and as the one country that can provide safe, relatively easy access to the Indian Ocean and beyond.

The China-Myanmar Economic Corridor, part of the Belt and Road Initiative, includes an already built deep-sea port at Kyaukphyu on the Bay of Bengal and plans for highways and railways linking Myanmar’s coast to China’s southern Yunnan province, and is a vital link in China’s push south.

For decades, the West condemned Myanmar’s junta for human rights abuses but did little constructive to loosen China’s ever-tightening grip on Myanmar. Instead, it was the generals themselves who took the initiative to mitigate Myanmar’s dependence on Beijing.

According to Myanmar army documents seen by Asia Times, the generals viewed dependence on Beijing as a threat to national sovereignty and concluded that Myanmar needed better relations with the West to maintain sovereignty and independence.

That required certain democratic concessions to the West, including freeing political prisoners, allowing press freedom and making way for political parties like Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy to contest elections. The NLD won in a landslide in 2015, outpacing the military’s Union Solidarity and Development Party proxy and catapulting Suu Kyi to power as state counselor.  

The West initially cheered this, though Suu Kyi kept an open line to Beijing, especially as Western criticism of her rule mounted over the Rohingya issue. But when the NLD won another landslide in 2020, the generals had had enough and seized power in a February 2021 coup, ending what many had hoped was the start of a new democratic experiment, but which was, in reality, a brief interlude in a long history of direct and indirect military rule.

The West condemned the coup and reimposed sanctions, opening the way for China to become the Myanmar military’s main supporter again, diplomatically and financially. That, in turn, has put the Belt and Road Initiative-driven CMEC back on track, which analysts say is vital to China’s overall strategy for the region, not least by offering an alternative to its shipping vulnerability at the Malacca Strait chokepoint.

Significantly, Myanmar’s military-drafted 2008 constitution forbids the presence of foreign troops from its soil – but China has recently found a way around the ban. A Private Security Service Law that took effect in February 2025 allows foreign security companies to operate in the country.

Because Chinese private security firms have close ties to the state and PLA, their deployments effectively function as a semi-official presence. Under the law, contractors from these security companies are allowed to bear arms. They have arrived mainly to guard the Chinese-built oil and gas pipelines that run over 2,000 kilometers from the Bay of Bengal to Yunnan, along with resource-extraction sites and the Chinese technicians who work there.

While Myanmar may not yet host a facility like Ban Keun, Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar can be seen as successes of the Belt and Road Initiative’s broader strategy of paving the way for regional military inroads, while the US and other outside powers appear neither willing nor able to challenge them.

Shawn W. Crispin contributed reporting from Bangkok.

Michael Douglas Reveals Chilling Words He Heard from Doctor

0
michael-douglas-reveals-chilling-words-he-heard-from-doctor
Michael Douglas Reveals Chilling Words He Heard from Doctor


Michael Douglas is looking back on one of the darkest periods of his life — and the unusual way a close friend helped him face a terrifying stage IV cancer diagnosis.

The 82-year-old Hollywood legend revisits his 2010 cancer battle in his newly released memoir, One Helluva Ride, revealing the fear, anger and uncertainty that followed the discovery of a tumor at the base of his tongue.

Douglas was initially publicly described as having throat cancer. He later clarified that he had actually been diagnosed with stage IV tongue cancer, a distinction that was kept quiet at the time because doctors feared he might require surgery that could dramatically affect his appearance and ability to speak.

For an actor whose voice and face had helped make him one of Hollywood’s biggest stars, the possibilities were frightening.

But amid the grim conversations with doctors and family members, Douglas says writer and longtime friend Shane Salerno reacted in a way almost no one else would have dared.

Instead of offering sympathy, Salerno began sending him deliberately brutal emails.

According to Douglas’ account, one message suggested he probably would not survive because he was “just Kirk Douglas’s son.” Another mocked his beginnings as a television actor, while a third jokingly suggested he would never win an Oscar or defeat cancer.

The messages sound cruel without context, but Douglas understood exactly what his friend was doing.

Rather than treating him as fragile or doomed, Salerno was trying to provoke the famously competitive actor into fighting back.

Douglas’ response made clear that it worked.

“Keep ’em coming,” he fired back, along with an expletive.

The dark humor arrived during an extraordinarily serious moment.

Douglas had been diagnosed in August 2010 after months of medical appointments failed to identify what was causing persistent problems in his throat and mouth. He later recalled that a specialist finally discovered a walnut-sized tumor near the base of his tongue.

By then, the disease was stage IV.

The diagnosis left Douglas contemplating the possibility that his life — and extraordinary career — could suddenly be coming to an end.

Doctors presented him with difficult treatment options. One involved surgery that potentially could have removed part of his tongue and jaw. The other was an aggressive combination of chemotherapy and radiation.

Douglas chose chemotherapy and radiation.

Treatment took a brutal physical toll. He lost significant weight and endured weeks of intensive therapy, but the decision ultimately paid off. Douglas survived the disease and has continued working and making public appearances more than 15 years after his diagnosis.

His recovery is one reason the episode takes on a different meaning in One Helluva Ride, released Oct. 6. Rather than revealing a new health crisis, Douglas is recounting the cancer battle that nearly changed — or ended — his life in 2010.

The ordeal also unfolded during an especially painful period for his family.

Douglas’ oldest son, Cameron Douglas, was in federal prison at the time following drug-related legal troubles. Michael said he deliberately avoided telling Cameron about the cancer at first because his son was already struggling to survive behind bars and stay away from drugs.

Douglas feared adding his own potentially fatal illness to that burden.

“He had enough problems of his own in prison,” Douglas writes in the memoir, explaining that he wanted Cameron focused on staying alive, getting clean and eventually coming home.

But keeping the diagnosis secret became virtually impossible.

Douglas appeared on Late Show with David Letterman in August 2010 and publicly discussed the seriousness of his illness. News of the interview spread quickly, including inside the prison where Cameron was being held.

Cameron eventually learned about his father’s cancer from other inmates and contacted him.

Douglas recalls apologizing for not telling his son himself before explaining that the cancer was stage IV. Cameron was devastated, especially because incarceration left him unable to be with his father while he underwent treatment.

The cancer diagnosis came at a remarkable point in Douglas’ life.

The son of Hollywood icon Kirk Douglas had already spent decades establishing an identity beyond his famous father’s shadow. He starred in movies including Wall Street, Fatal Attraction, Basic Instinct and Romancing the Stone and became one of his generation’s most recognizable leading men.

He also built an extraordinary career behind the camera.

Douglas won an Academy Award as a producer of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest before later winning the best actor Oscar for his performance as Gordon Gekko in Wall Street.

That history made Salerno’s jokes about Douglas being merely a television actor who would never win an Oscar particularly pointed. They were deliberately absurd attacks on accomplishments Douglas had already achieved — designed, according to Douglas’ telling, to bring out his stubbornness rather than his fear.

More than 15 years later, Douglas is not only able to tell the story himself but has made surviving cancer part of a much larger examination of his life.

One Helluva Ride also explores his complicated relationship with Kirk Douglas, his struggles with drugs and alcohol, his marriages, fatherhood and the highs and lows of a career stretching across more than half a century.

In recent interviews surrounding the memoir’s release, Douglas has spoken openly about surviving stage IV tongue cancer and how the experience changed his priorities.

What once looked like a possible “death sentence” instead became another chapter in a life Douglas now appears determined to document on his own terms.

And the friend who told him he probably wouldn’t make it?

Douglas proved him spectacularly wrong.

Fact-check note: Douglas’ memoir was released Oct. 6, 2026 by Grand Central Publishing. Recent interviews describe his 2010 illness as stage IV tongue cancer, while Douglas previously explained that it was initially presented publicly as throat cancer because of concerns about possible disfiguring surgery. hachettebookgroup.com

President Trump Rules Out Iran Strikes Before November Elections, Citing Progress in Talks

0
president-trump-rules-out-iran-strikes-before-november-elections,-citing-progress-in-talks
President Trump Rules Out Iran Strikes Before November Elections, Citing Progress in Talks


President Donald Trump said Thursday that the United States would not launch new military strikes against Iran before the November 3 congressional midterm elections, citing progress in diplomatic discussions with Tehran despite continuing tensions over Iran’s nuclear program and restrictions on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

“We are having productive discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” President Trump wrote on Truth Social.

The US president said Washington would maintain its naval blockade of Iranian oil shipments while negotiations continued.

“We will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the Midterm Elections to be held in the United States on November 3rd,” he wrote, adding, “IRAN WILL NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!”

The announcement followed reports that the Pentagon was preparing options for renewed large-scale strikes against Iranian military, energy, and nuclear facilities. Axios reported that US Central Command had been instructed to complete preparations for potential operations.

Washington and Tehran have exchanged proposals aimed at ending the conflict, which began February 28 with joint US-Israeli strikes against Iran. A temporary ceasefire agreement reached in June subsequently collapsed as fighting resumed and disputes over control of Hormuz continued.

The strategic waterway, through which roughly one-fifth of global oil supplies passed before the war, has experienced severe shipping disruptions, contributing to higher energy prices worldwide.

President Trump’s announcement helped ease market concerns. Brent crude fell to approximately $103 a barrel Friday after previously climbing above $104 on fears of renewed military action.

The administration also announced additional sanctions Thursday targeting networks and vessels involved in transporting Iranian petroleum, maintaining economic pressure despite the diplomatic opening.

The conflict has become a growing domestic political concern as Republicans prepare for the midterms. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 60% of Americans disapproved of President Trump’s handling of the war.

Although the US president has ruled out attacks before November 3, he has left open the possibility of renewed military operations afterward if negotiations fail.

Let’s Encrypt cuts certificate lifetimes to 64 days starting February 2027

0
let’s-encrypt-cuts-certificate-lifetimes-to-64-days-starting-february-2027
Let’s Encrypt cuts certificate lifetimes to 64 days starting February 2027

Let’s Encrypt is continuing a push toward tighter security by reducing free SSL/TLS certificate lifetimes from 90 days to 64 days, starting February 10, 2027. For administrators already implementing modern ACME clients that support ARI (ACME Renewal Information), the change should be seamless. For those still relying on hardcoded renewal schedules or manual processes, February will be the deadline to update before certificates start expiring unexpectedly.

Starting on October 14, Let’s Encrypt will begin testing the 64-day certificates, and interested users can opt in to test their setups before production goes live.

Prior to Let’s Encrypt’s launch in early 2016, certificates were often issued for as long as one to three years. The service started with 90-day certificates to force renewal automation that didn’t previously exist. Shorter certificate validity periods limited vulnerabilities from private key thefts and encouraged accelerated HTTPS adoption across the web.

This move shook  industry norms at the time, but by limiting the certificate lifetime, the certs are less likely to cause damage if compromised or assigned in error. The move down to 64 days continues this logic, and the lifespans will only continue to get shorter as time goes on, with 45-day defaults planned to follow in 2028.

Just as the initial rollout of Let’s Encrypt aimed to push users toward HTTPS, the shortened certificate windows are aimed at moving users to full ACME automation. The ACME protocol, and, more specifically, ARI (ACME Renewal Information), allows the certificate authority to tell the client when it’s time to renew. Although ARI does this, many deployments are still stuck on scripted update intervals that trigger at fixed offsets like “60 days before expiration.”

Let’s Encrypt is getting this information out now to warn these users to audit their cron jobs and runbooks to automatically renew at two-thirds their lifespan and, in doing so, prepare for the additional shrinkage of 45-day certificates planned for 2028.

What web administrators can do now

  • The company specifically recommends users search for hardcoded renewal numbers like 83, 80, and 60 (common previous renewal targets for 90-day certificates) and update them to renew prior to expiration at the new 64-day limit.
  • Verify your ACME client supports ARI; if not, update renewal scripts.
  • Ensure notifications are set in the event of certificate expiration or renewal failures
  • Take advantage of the October 14 testing period before the official rollout.

Alongside certificate lifetimes, Let’s Encrypt is also compressing validation timelines. Authorization reuse periods will shrink from 30 days to 10 days, and eventually to seven hours by 2028. This step should eliminate the need for CAA rechecks. Most operators won’t notice the change unless their ACME clients depend on cached validation data.

Administrators will have about four months to test their renewal automations before the February 10 deadline, or risk downtime when the deadline arrives.

Zelenskiy accuses US of inaction as Russian strikes kill over 70 in two days

0
zelenskiy-accuses-us-of-inaction-as-russian-strikes-kill-over-70-in-two-days
Zelenskiy accuses US of inaction as Russian strikes kill over 70 in two days


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy accused the US of ​being unwilling to help Ukraine after a Russian bomb attack on Thursday killed at least 35 people in the east, sending the two-day death toll ‌from Russian strikes to over 70.

Hours after the strike on the embattled city of Kramatorsk tore through two buses, Zelenskiy criticised Washington’s effort to pursue economic ties with Russia while also seeking to mediate the more than four-year war.

City authorities reported a new drone attack in the evening that killed two people. That brought to 35 the total death toll in the city.

Local authorities reported that a Russian guided aerial bomb ​killed two people in a village in southeastern Dnipropetrovsk and one person died in the western city of Ivano-Frankivsk.

The attacks were launched a day after a mass ​Russian drone and missile assault killed dozens across Ukraine — 22 of them in a residential building in the central town of Pryluky, around ⁠130 km (80 miles) east of Kyiv.

Speaking in the early evening, Zelenskiy said 78 people were killed and 215 wounded by strikes in the last two days across Ukraine.

Speaking to reporters ​in Pryluky, the Ukrainian leader urged the US to accede to his requests to expand Ukraine’s access to the Starlink satellite service to help it target Russian ballistic-missile launchers.

‘THAT’S CALLED UNWILLINGNESS’

“Open ​Starlink for Ukraine. You did open it when you were responding to Iran … I’ve said quite openly — give it to us, help us defend our skies and dominate there. And then Putin will sit down at the negotiating table,” he said in an emotional statement.

Ukraine has in recent months aimed to wrest the battlefield initiative from Russia, whose gains have slowed this year, but is still suffering from Moscow’s increasingly ​brutal air war.

“So where’s the truth here, where’s the honesty? Where’s the stalemate? … That’s called unwillingness,” he said, referring to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s assertion earlier on Thursday ​the war is at a stalemate and that the United States would keep working toward a settlement.

“One cannot, on the one hand, negotiate with the Russians about future economic projects, whilst on the other ‌hand say that ⁠we find ourselves in some sort of … diplomatic stalemate,” Zelenskiy added.

Top Russian and US officials, including US Special Envoy Jared Kushner, have held talks about bringing a US investor into the Nord Stream pipelines that delivered Russian gas to Germany before Moscow invaded Ukraine, Reuters reported on Thursday. Ukrainian negotiators will travel to the US on Friday and Saturday for talks, Zelenskiy added, urging US President Donald Trump to increase sanction pressure on Russia.

Zelenskiy told reporters in Kyiv that he expected Kyiv’s European partners to join the talks with the US. He also said Ukrainian negotiators would ​raise the issue of air defences in ​light of near-constant Russian attacks.

INTENSIFYING STRIKES

Twenty people ⁠were wounded in the Kramatorsk strike — one of the biggest single attacks of the year by Russia. Moscow has denied targeting civilians, but regularly pounds cities with missiles and drones.

“The Russians are deliberately targeting civilians. For them, a bus full of passengers is an attractive target precisely ​because a single strike can kill as many people as possible,” regional governor Vadym Filashkin said on the Telegram app.

Images posted by ​officials showed bodies strewn across ⁠a street littered with debris and a charred shell of a bus. Some bodies had not been identified yet, Zelenskiy said, adding that the attack would not go unanswered.

Separately, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said four people were killed and 19 wounded in morning attacks on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv. Water and electricity supplies were subject to interruptions which officials said would take time to put ⁠right.

Russia has ​unleashed relentless drone strikes against Kyiv in recent weeks, targeting warehouses, data centres and renewing its campaign against ​Ukraine’s power grid ahead of winter.

Russian technology and AI company Yandex said it could not yet determine whether equipment at a data centre hit by a Ukrainian drone attack could be restored. Zelenskiy did not refer specifically to the ​strike on Yandex, but said Ukraine was “mirroring” Russian attacks on data centres.

Source:  Reuters

Mind games: AI behaves more like a brain than a database

0
mind-games:-ai-behaves-more-like-a-brain-than-a-database
Mind games: AI behaves more like a brain than a database

When people think about what ChatGPT or other large language models are doing behind the scenes, it’s common to reach for the language of computing. You might assume there is a database, or a logical series of steps being executed, in order to provide a response to your query.

Picturing AI responses as akin to your computer pulling up a file is a sensible line of thinking. But it’s incorrect. Understanding the central influence of cognitive science in AI’s evolution helps explain why.

AI’s history isn’t only a computer science story. Fundamental advances that gave rise to today’s AI were brought about by people whose goal was to understand the human mind, not help you with your homework or travel itinerary. This distinction is important, because it helps better explain how these systems “behave” the way they do.

We are cognitive scientists who teach students about the interdisciplinary roots of our field, including its deep and often overlooked ties to computer science and AI. There’s a shared history that often gets lost in conversations about what AI is doing.

AI’s lineage is often overlooked

The term “artificial intelligence” was coined in 1956, at a Dartmouth College workshop. At the time, people thought that a machine could be made intelligent if you could write down the right set of rules for it to follow.

Rather than build a machine that followed rules, however, psychologist Frank Rosenblatt built one in 1958 – the Perceptron – that learned from examples. Rosenblatt hadn’t been at the Dartmouth workshop, but he was thinking about how to make a machine intelligent in a fundamentally different, more human way. His key insight was to build an artificial neural network: a computer algorithm modeled loosely on the architecture of the brain.

This approach built on the work of psychologists like Donald Hebb who were studying brains and behavior. Specifically, Hebb explored how neural connections strengthen when used, a fundamental insight that later seeded machine learning.

Further advances came in the 1980s, as psychologists sought to explain how people perform complex cognitive tasks, such as recognizing words and forming memories.

Cognitive and computer scientists together – David Rumelhart, Geoffrey Hinton and Ronald Williams – figured out how to train artificial neural networks with multiple layers, an idea that later became known as “deep learning.” These multilayered neural networks were capable of more complex tasks and generalizing what they “learned” to apply to new examples.

In the following decades, computer scientists and engineers enabled computing capabilities to be scaled up, developing graphics chips, the transformer architecture and more. Without these systems, modern AI would still struggle to recognize letters and words, rather than be able to hold realistic conversations in natural language.

The fundamental insights, however, came from the study of the mind: AI should learn from examples, and its architecture should be based on the human brain.

These foundational ideas matter for reasons of practicality. Modern AI isn’t born from rules – it’s grown from examples. And things that are grown are not as predictable as systems based on rules.

Its origin helps explain its ‘behavior’

Human intuitions and mental models about how technology works govern how people use it. The idea of AI as software – deterministic, fact-retrieving – causes people to misinterpret the outputs they provide.

AI “hallucinations” are common; chatbots often state falsehoods. Thinking of AI as a database makes this behavior appear confusing. How could a system look up an answer that doesn’t exist?

But human memory doesn’t “look up” answers. It is reconstructive and imperfect, filling in gaps with plausible details. Thanks to pioneering work by psychologist Elizabeth Loftus, researchers know that false memories are unfortunately common and can be implanted with relative ease.

A system that “looks something up” gives the same answer every time, but it is therefore limited in responding to a finite set of questions. Human minds don’t work that way, and neither does AI. The price to pay for being able to generalize to new questions and tasks is a system prone to confabulation.

Thinking of AI as like a primitive brain also helps explain additional puzzling behaviors, such as getting different answers to the same question.

Ask your young child what they want for dinner twice and you may get different requests. Framing matters when interacting with an AI system too, as these systems can be nudged into giving you answers you prefer. They operate in a probabilistic fashion, much like human memory, not in a deterministic fashion, like a calculator.

None of this means that AI necessarily thinks like people do, if the systems think at all. Humans and AI commonly “perceive” things differently; computer vision can spot subtle abnormalities that human screeners might miss, but might also misinterpret something, such as a defaced road sign.

Silhouette of a bird in flight across a cloudy sky.
It’s a bird, it’s a plane? People and AIs may not agree about what they’re ‘seeing.’ Geraint Rowland Photography/Moment via Getty Images via The Conversation

Why those origins still matter

If modern AI is unpredictable, how can people come to understand it?

The answer is by understanding where this technology came from. Recognizing that AI systems are more akin to brains than databases can help people build more accurate mental models of what AI can do and can lead to better ways of understanding how these systems work.

  1. Users overtrust the wrong things. With a significant proportion of ChatGPT users indicating that they use ChatGPT like a search engine, it seems that people are treating outputs as retrieved fact rather than fluent, confident guesses. This misunderstanding can cause users to skip the verification step they’d likely apply to a person and potentially make decisions, including financial ones, based on confabulation.
  2. Institutions grapple with differing mental models. Faculty remain split between banning AI tools outright and building them into coursework, treating AI as producing answers to be checked or trusted like collaborators. Divisions are causing confusion and sowing rifts among (and within) educators and their students.
  3. Computer science is rediscovering cognitive science’s questions. Today’s systems are opaque even to their builders. One approach to understanding them, probing what goes in and what comes out, resembles behaviorism, a once-dominant field of psychology that studied only observable behavior. Researchers are now moving toward interpretability: opening up the models to see what’s happening inside – closer in spirit to neuroscience – and working on problems cognitive scientists have chewed on for decades.

The exchange runs both ways. Just as computer science draws on cognitive science’s questions and methods, cognitive science draws on the accessibility of AI models themselves, using them to test and refine theories of the mind.

Computer science and cognitive science split off from one project decades ago: understanding how intelligence works. The more these fields keep trading questions and tools, the better placed humanity will be.

Michael Hout is associate dean of research and professor of psychology, New Mexico State University and Arryn Robbins is assistant professor of psychology, University of Richmond

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

RIP Margaret Hamilton, whose code saved the Apollo 11 Moon landing

0
rip-margaret-hamilton,-whose-code-saved-the-apollo-11-moon-landing
RIP Margaret Hamilton, whose code saved the Apollo 11 Moon landing

Margaret Hamilton, who coined the term “software engineering” and led the development of onboard flight software for NASA’s Apollo program in the 1960s, died last week at the age of 90. A recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2016, Hamilton was also immortalized as a LEGO minifig the following year—part of the “Women of NASA” set that also included astronauts Mae Jemison and Sally Ride.

“To say Margaret Hamilton was a pioneer—to say she was ahead of her time—would be a dramatic understatement. She was a software engineer at a time when that field was in its infancy, and she not only developed advanced code herself but also led a team in using that nascent technology to develop one of the most complex systems humanity had ever achieved,” said Olivier de Weck, interim head of the MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. “The Apollo program still stands as one of our greatest testaments to the power of collaboration, ingenuity, and engineering, and Hamilton was a fundamental contributor to that program’s success.”

Born in 1936 in Paoli, Indiana, Hamilton graduated from Earlham College in 1958 with a degree in mathematics and a minor in philosophy—the latter a nod to her father (a poet) and grandfather (a headmaster). She married her first husband, James Cox Hamilton, that same year. The plan was for her to work until he finished his law degree, after which he would support her through graduate school to earn a PhD in mathematics.

She ended up working for Edward Lorenz, the MIT mathematician who set out to construct a mathematical model of the weather using a set of differential equations representing changes in temperature, pressure, wind velocity, and the like. You’ve probably heard the famous story of how Lorenz kept a continuous simulation running on his LGP-30 computer, and of that fateful 1961 day when he realized that even small differences in starting values could lead to very different outcomes—a sensitivity to initial conditions that is a hallmark of chaos theory, along with strange attractors. You might not have known that it was Hamilton who was responsible for programming the LGP-30.

Computers were still a novelty at the time, and neither Lorenz nor Hamilton had any programming knowledge; they taught themselves. Per a 2019 Quanta article, Lorenz was amused by her unusual methods: For instance, she once bypassed the “clunky debugging process” by rolling the paper tape down the hallway and editing the binary code by hand with a pencil. “I’d poke holes for ones, and I’d cover up with Scotch tape the others,” she recalled. Hamilton moved to another project in 1961, but not before training her replacement: a recent math graduate from Mount Holyoke named Ellen Fetter. Lorenz acknowledged the contributions of both women in his papers.

To the Moon

Hamilton's Official photo for NASA, 1989

Hamilton’s official photo for NASA in 1989.

Margaret Hamilton holds a LEGO figure of ... herself.

Margaret Hamilton holds a Lego figure of herself in 2017.

In 1961, Hamilton moved to the SAGE project at MIT, writing software for a prototype XD-1 computer to aid the US Air Force in searching for possible enemy aircraft. Her first challenge: deciphering a program nobody had managed to get to work, perhaps because the author’s notes were written in Latin and Greek. Hamilton succeeded, noting with amusement that the program even printed out its answers in Greek and Latin. It was during this period that she became interested in the issue of software reliability.

By 1965, Hamilton was all set to go to graduate school as planned when her husband spotted a newspaper ad saying that MIT’s Instrumentation Lab needed people to develop onboard guidance computer software for NASA’s Apollo program. She was the first programmer hired, and the first woman, working on six lunar landing missions from 1969 to 1972. At the time, binary code was stored using copper wires wound around cores. A “1” was a wire passing through a core, and a “0” was a wire bypassing the core. New England textile workers were hired to weave them together into long ropes, earning Hamilton the moniker “rope mother,” since she was responsible for those ropes.

Hamilton would often bring her 4-year-old daughter, Lauren, to the lab on nights and weekends. The child loved pretending to be an astronaut in the simulators, and one day her random button-pressing caused the system to inexplicably crash. Apparently Lauren had typed “P01,” a pre-launch sequence, in the middle of the mission. Hamilton asked NASA if she could add a safeguard to prevent this from happening on an actual mission, but the higher-ups didn’t take it seriously. Then astronaut Jim Lovell actually made that error during the Apollo 8 manned mission to orbit the Moon, causing the navigational data to vanish. Hamilton was called in to retrieve the data, jokingly referring to this as the “Lauren bug.”

By 1968, Hamilton was assistant director in charge of the Command and Service Module team. Hamilton had the idea to incorporate a failsafe into the system software’s “priority display” interface routines, should the onboard guidance computer become overloaded with more tasks than it could handle in real time.

Barack Obama awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Hamilton in 2016

President Barack Obama awarded Hamilton the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2016.

President Barack Obama awarded Hamilton the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2016. Credit: Public domain

That’s exactly what happened on the historic Apollo 11 mission in 1969. As the Eagle lunar module approached the Moon, Buzz Aldrin entered the codes to display altitude and other relevant data on the screen. The onboard computer started flashing alarms, forcing Mission Control to consider aborting the landing. Hamilton’s fail-safe meant that the computer was prioritizing essential tasks and canceling nonessential ones, and the alarm was to let astronauts know that this was happening. Thanks to Hamilton’s foresight, Eagle still safely landed on the Sea of Tranquility.

As Hamilton herself later recalled in a 1971 letter:

The computer (or rather the software in it) was smart enough to recognize that it was being asked to perform more tasks than it should be performing. It then sent out an alarm, which meant to the astronaut, “I’m overloaded with more tasks than I should be doing at this time and I’m going to keep only the more important tasks”; i.e., the ones needed for landing … Actually, the computer was programmed to do more than recognize error conditions. A complete set of recovery programs was incorporated into the software. The software’s action, in this case, was to eliminate lower priority tasks and re-establish the more important ones … If the computer hadn’t recognized this problem and taken recovery action, I doubt if Apollo 11 would have been the successful Moon landing it was.

The Apollo software she helped develop was added to GitHub in 2015. In 2019, Google marked the 50th anniversary of the Moon landing—and Hamilton’s crucial contribution—by training over 100,000 mirrors at its Mojave Desert solar power farm to create a massive portrait of Hamilton in reflected moonlight.

After the Apollo program ended, the Instrumentation Lab became the independent Draper Laboratory. Hamilton worked there until 1976, when she founded Higher Order Software, based on her work on error prevention and fault tolerance. In 1985, she left the company to found Hamilton Technologies. Its main product is the Universal Systems Language (USL) for developing complex software systems that prioritized error prevention and defensive programming.

Hamilton is survived by her daughter, Lauren Hamilton; her son-in-law, Richard Selesnick; two grandsons; four great-grandchildren; and her siblings John, David, and Kathryn.

ICE Agent on Scene of NYC Shooting Was Posing as Construction Worker, Eyewitness Says

0
ice-agent-on-scene-of-nyc-shooting-was-posing-as-construction-worker,-eyewitness-says
ICE Agent on Scene of NYC Shooting Was Posing as Construction Worker, Eyewitness Says


U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents shot a person in New York City on Thursday afternoon, according to police.

The shooting took place around 4 p.m. in Manhattan’s Marble Hill neighborhood, according to a statement from the New York Police Department. The NYPD said the victim was taken to a local hospital and was conscious, but provided no further information about the victim.

Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., told The Intercept that there was a child in the car and that the child is OK, which New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani later confirmed in a statement.

“This afternoon in Marble Hill, a New Yorker was shot by an ICE agent in a residential neighborhood. Early reports indicate agents surrounded him and a 5-year-old child in his car before firing multiple rounds,” Mamdani said. “We believe the child was physically unharmed.”

At a press conference, Espaillat said that he attempted to visit the shooting victim in the hospital, but was prevented from doing so by federal authorities.

“I went to the hospital to see the victim,” Espaillat said, “but we were not allowed by ICE agents to go in the room.”

A neighbor, Iris Rosa, said the shooting happened just as a nearby school was being let out. After hiding in a store for a few minutes, she said she went to look at the scene and said it looked like agents had shot into a car.

The victim, Rosa said, was on the ground bleeding and being held down by the agents. A baby, she said, was in the car and was held by ICE agents until someone picked the child up.

Photos of the aftermath of the shooting, taken by a neighbor and obtained by The Intercept, show apparent government agents in plain clothes and tactical vests pinning a man on the asphalt. Another man in a high-visibility vest is clutching an assault rifle while holding a phone between his cheek and shoulder.

Rosa, the neighbor, said a man with a high-visibility vest appeared to be posing as a construction worker, but as she watched, Rosa told The Intercept, the man took the vest and put it in a nearby vehicle.

ICE agents routinely pose as construction workers in order to stakeout targets for immigrations.

Representatives of Mayor Zohran Mamdani and ICE did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security said the shooting occurred during “a targeted enforcement operation.”

“During the incident, an ICE officer discharged his weapon and the criminal illegal alien was injured,” the spokesperson wrote in a statement. “ICE officers immediately rendered aid. The individual is alive and at a local hospital. The FBI and HSI are on the scene. The incident remains under investigation.”

The victim is the latest of at least 25 people to be shot by federal immigration agents this year. In July, after two fatal ICE shootings and a botched arrest in Las Vegas by plainclothes agents wearing hooded sweatshirts, the agency mandated a new dress code for field operations.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she had been briefed on the shooting. “We expect federal authorities to provide a full and transparent accounting of the circumstances surrounding this incident,” she said on X.

“ICE’s violent tactics are a clear danger to all New Yorkers, as today’s shooting in a residential neighborhood demonstrates,” said Murad Awawdeh, the head of the advocacy group New York Immigration Coalition, in a statement. “This incident is another reminder of the unchecked, rampant violence ICE has been spreading throughout our communities.”

This is a developing story and may be updated.

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
- Advertisement -
Google search engine

Recent Posts