A Jerusalem Post unique study on Tuesday discovered that 51% of Israelis think Hamas’ treatment of captives is similar to Nazi war criminal activities, while another 30% acknowledge resemblances however stop brief of complete equivalence. On the other hand, 11% turn down the contrast outright, and 8 percent stay uncertain – which, in today’s truth, is simply a courteous method of stating, “I ‘d rather not respond to that.”
Let’s be clear: This isn’t simply feeling talking. This is not Israelis comprehending for the most astonishing historic recommendation they can discover.
The numbers indicate something extensive: An awareness that Hamas isn’t simply any terrorist company however a motion notified by decades-old ideology whose roots reach all the method to Nazi propaganda. The concept of Hitler’s effect ending in some Berlin bunker is a Western mirage. Here, in Israel, where that exact same ideology was reanimated in blood and fire on October 7, no one has the high-end of such impressions.
German historian: Hamas atrocities an ‘overjoyed act of antisemitic massacre’
Dr. Matthias Küntzel, a German historian and among the prominent specialists on Islamist antisemitism, has actually invested years recording how Nazi Germany actively spread out antisemitic propaganda in the Middle East throughout The Second World War. In an interview with Makor Rishon, he described how Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, personally worked together with Hitler, assisting to hire Arab fighters for the Waffen-SS and making sure Nazi antisemitism was embedded in the Arab world long after the Third Reich fell. Küntzel makes from the response to October 7 the proof for this tradition, calling the Hamas atrocities an “overjoyed act of antisemitic massacre.” Therein lies the distinction in between terrorism and genocide: one eliminates to obtain political take advantage of, another for the simple, uncontainable delight of it.
This is not a theory, this is what Hamas states. Their 1988 charter is soaked in Nazi ideology, brimming with recommendations to The Procedures of the Elders of Zion, the exact same antisemitic conspiracy theory that Hitler counted on to validate his Last Service. It does not discuss profession, it mentions Jews as worldwide manipulators that require to be rubbed out the face of the earth.
ISGAP senior scientist Teacher David Patterson put it starkly in his book From Hitler to Hamas: A Genealogy of Evil: Hamas does not simply desire Israel gone, it desires Jews dead, all over.
He declares that while the Nazis framed their war as racial filtration, Hamas frames it as spiritual responsibility. “The Nazi required a Last Service. The jihadist requires an armageddon.” That’s why they burn kids alive and after that shout “Allah Akbar” over the ashes. That’s why they behead children and disperse the video like a recruitment video. That’s why they do not even pretend to have a vision for governing Gaza– they are too taken in by their desire for Jewish blood to believe beyond the next massacre.
For over half of Israelis, these truths make the Hamas-Nazi contrast self-evident. This is a war versus a force that desires Jewish presence eliminated. That understanding is forming the method Israelis see the war. If Hamas is the brand-new Nazis, then working out with them is as unbelievable as asking Churchill to sign a ceasefire with Hitler in 1942. If Hamas is the brand-new Nazis, then the only method forward is the one the Allies took in 1945: genuine surrender, and overall elimination.
Naturally, 41% of Israelis demur, and some argue that the Holocaust was a distinctively industrialized genocide, which Hamas, harsh though it is, does not have the wherewithal to match that. That view is held especially by opposition citizens, just 47% of whom entirely purchase the Hamas-Nazi example, whereas 60% of union citizens do. The queasiness is easy to understand– the occupation of historians is consentaneous in warning versus turning every harsh program into a Nazi clone.
However there is likewise a political computation included. Some are worried that extending the Nazi contrast too far will hurt Israel’s case diplomatically, pushing away the allies currently revealing hesitation to support the war. Naturally, there’s the unmentioned worry that as long as Israel leans greatly onto the Holocaust example, it welcomes others to connect the actions of the Israeli army with those of Nazi Germany – a profane inversion currently utilized on European schools and in some American ones, by antisemites.
That stated, that hesitation not does anything to alter anything in today scenario. Hamas developed itself on Nazi ideology, and it serves as such. Their not having the gas chambers suggests absolutely nothing, which makes them no less than a genocidal motion, simply their method operandi is various. October 7 was not a war crime-it was the Holocaust on a little scale. That’s what Hamas fighters believed they were doing, which’s why their sympathizers throughout the Arab world still call Hitler a hero.
The distinction in between 1942 and 2025 is that this time, the Jews aren’t defenseless. The concern now is whether Israel – and the world – has the stomach to act appropriately.
If history teaches us anything, it is this: Nazis do not work out. They get damaged.
.