The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) was primarily established by five oil-exporting nations as a defiant response to the dominance of the global energy giants. These corporations, famously known as the “Seven Sisters,” wielded absolute control over the industry—dictating production levels and setting prices without even consulting the sovereign nations whose resources they were extracting. It was, in essence, another form of economic occupation, persisting even after many of these countries had technically achieved their political independence.
When those five founding members gathered at the Baghdad Conference in September 1960, they sought to do more than just stabilize their revenues; they aimed to reclaim their national sovereignty from a colonial-era pricing structure.
This collective defiance in 1960 effectively shifted the gravity of global energy politics from boardroom meetings in London and New York to the sovereign capitals of the Global South. For decades, OPEC operated on a foundation of unified discipline, with Saudi Arabia acting as the undisputed “swing producer” and the UAE as its most reliable regional ally. Together, they formed a formidable bloc capable of stabilizing markets or, as seen in 1973, shaking the foundations of ever-oil thirsty Western economies.
The UAE’s decision to withdraw from the organization follows years of escalating friction over production quotas. While OPEC sought to maintain price equilibrium through supply cuts, Abu Dhabi viewed these restrictions as a ceiling on its sovereign growth, especially after investing billions to reach a production capacity of 5 million barrels per day by 2027, up from a current capacity of over 4.8 million barrels per day. Had Abu Dhabi remained within OPEC and continued to abide by its decisions, its production would have stayed capped at around 3.5 million barrels per day, leaving a massive portion of its investment untapped.
READ: Saudi oil production falls to lowest level since 1990 amid Hormuz disruption
The UAE officially framed its exit as the result of a ‘comprehensive review’ of its long-term economic path.
By prioritizing ‘national interests,’ Abu Dhabi is signaling that the era of sacrificing domestic revenue for the sake of the ‘OPEC and OPEC+ family’ is over.
Diplomatically, the Emirates maintains that this move is not an act of hostility toward Riyadh. However, the subtext is clear: Abu Dhabi will no longer allow its fiscal policy to be dictated by its neighbor. Ironically, for years, the UAE was among the most disciplined members in adhering to production cuts—often keeping more than a third of its capacity idle.
This history of compliance makes the departure even more damaging; it is not the exit of a ‘cheater’ looking for a quick win, but the exit of a loyalist who no longer believes in the collective mission.
The Emirates’ decision should also be viewed within the regional political agendas and how aligned are they with Riyadh’s. Both countries are backing opposing sides in the Sudanese civil war, with devastating consequences for the region. Similarly, they remain on different sides of critical crises such as Libya. Saudi Arabia is also competing with the UAE for influence over Egypt through massive financial investments, while both clash over regional developments around the Red Sea.
The UAE’s favouring of Somaliland’s independence is a prime example of this divergence. Furthermore, Riyadh remains wary of Abu Dhabi’s accelerated normalization with Israel, while it continues to seek a substantial strategic price for itself to follow suit.
The joint Israeli-American war on Iran, launched this past February, provides the critical regional context for Abu Dhabi’s abrupt departure. While the conflict caused staggering losses for both the Emirates and Saudi Arabia, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz has been far more devastating for the UAE. Riyadh possesses the massive ‘East-West’ Petroline, which allows it to bypass the Strait and export up to 7 million barrels per day via the Red Sea. In contrast, the UAE’s bypass capacity is far more limited, leaving a larger portion of its exports stranded. Furthermore, having long anchored its economic model on tourism, global logistics, and finance, the UAE saw its ‘safe-haven’ reputation rattled by the regional instability. To recoup these massive non-oil losses, Abu Dhabi must now maximize its oil export capacity—a strategic necessity that is only possible by operating outside the restrictive constraints of OPEC.
READ: UAE Gulf Marine Services profit falls 24% after Gulf war disrupts vessel operations
The withdrawal signals a profound fracture in the long-standing ‘Gulf Consensus’ led by Riyadh.
For decades, the GCC states presented a unified front in energy markets, providing the bedrock of OPEC’s global influence. With the UAE now charting its own course, the internal cohesion that once allowed the Gulf to steer global prices has effectively collapsed.
Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s historic ‘swing producer,’ has long used the organization to project geopolitical power. Riyadh has a well-documented history of both enforcing and breaking rules to suit its own agenda—most notably during the 1985–86 price war when it flooded the market to reclaim share, and most famously during the 1973 Oil Crisis. Back then, Riyadh transformed oil into a potent geopolitical weapon against the West in a historic defense of Palestinian rights. In a sense, Abu Dhabi is now mirroring Riyadh’s 1980s playbook; by refusing to comply with restrictive quotas and ultimately exiting OPEC, it has prioritized market share and national interest over the collective.
The regional fallout remains uncertain, particularly for the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC)—an institution that, as of 2026, is officially rebranding itself as the Arab Energy Organization to pivot toward a post-petroleum mandate. As a founding pillar of this bloc, the UAE’s potential distancing would signal more than just an economic shift; it would represent a fundamental break in Arab energy nominal solidarity. With Abu Dhabi leaving OPEC the historic concept of a unified ‘Arab oil weapon’—so central to the regional identity of the 20th century—will be relegated to a relic of the past. Without the Emirates, any remaining collective energy front becomes a shadow of its former self. Ultimately, the UAE’s exit from OPEC is more than a mere dispute over production quotas; it is a declaration of economic maturity and strategic independence. Being strongly allied to the US expect Abu Dhabi to help the Trump administration by bombing more oil to ease domestic US prices. In this new geopolitical landscape, triggered by the shocks of the February war and the literal closure of the Strait of Hormuz, survival is no longer found in collective bargaining, but in individual agility. As the ‘Gulf Consensus’ gives way to a fractured and competitive marketplace, the burden now falls on Riyadh to prove that a unified OPEC still has a purpose in a world where its most disciplined members are no longer willing to wait for permission to grow.
OPINION: The barometer of volatility: How the world became a hostage to Trump’s mood
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
